My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP52810
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP52810
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:57:18 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:28:46 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/31/2000
Doc Name
1999 ARR 1999 SOIL SAMPLING
Permit Index Doc Type
ANNUAL RECLAMATION REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
1999 Soil Sampling: Seneca Mine, Hayden Colorado <br />the site. Achieving adequate vegetative cover could be problematic over time. Site <br />• conditions can only be ameliorated if more subsoil is available. Ripping on the <br />contour to reduce compaction can also be problematic if ripping penetrates past 1.5 <br />feet. Infiltration will bypass the soil medium and drain through the porous cobble <br />stone spoil. It is recommended that further sampling occur at this site to determine <br />whether the depth to cobble stone spoil material is typical or an anomaly. SEN-2-99 <br />is suitable and, lacking an overly enthusiastic wildlife foraging campaign, should <br />yield a productive shrubland community. Fertilizer application for the area is not <br />indicated especially since there is already high organic matter levels. <br />Seneca II-W <br />10 sites were sampled on approximately 150 acres of land. Field descriptions are <br />located in Appendix IV and lab data is located in Appendix II. <br />Topsoil- All topsoil in all sample pits classifies as suitable topsoil (Appendix III, <br />Table-2). 2W-5-99 borders on marginally suitable as texture straddles the clay loam- <br />clay boundary. All other indications of 2W-5-99 result in a classification of suitable <br />topsoil. The results follow: <br />Depth- The average depth of topsoil is 20 inches (1.7 feet). Depth of topsoil <br />ranges 10 to 25 inches (.8 to 2.1 feet). The topsoil in all sample pits consisted <br />of two horizons. The upper horizon averages 8 inches of thickness and <br />• ranges in depth from 6 to 10 inches in thickness. The lower topsoil horizon <br />averages 12 inches in thickness and ranges from 6 to 16 inches in thickness. <br />The difference in horizons is due to structure and dry and moist consistence <br />discussed below. All other characteristics between horizons are the same. <br />Textures- Textures range loam to clay loam. One sample bordered on clay <br />(2W-5-99) and one sample was a sandy clay loam (2W-9-99). Clay content <br />averages 26 percent and ranges 20 to 40 percent, sand content averages 34 <br />percent and ranges 20 to 46 percent. Silt content averages 40 percent and <br />ranges 27 to 47 percent. <br />Rock Fragments- Rock fragments average 5 percent and range 0 to 20 <br />percent. Rock Fragments are predominantly gravel size (2mm to 75mm) of <br />sedimentary origin, primarily sandstone. <br />Structure- The upper horizon in all sample pits except two are moderate <br />medium and coarse platy structure. The resultant structure and depth of the <br />structure is consistent with a mechanically disked layer. Two sample pits 2W- <br />1-99 and 2W-5-99that are located on gentle slopes of S and 12 percent and <br />have strong coarse and very coarse platy structure indicative of extra traffic <br />and a resultant increase in compaction. 2W-5-99 borders on clay and the <br />• resultant stronger structure may be due to the higher density of the clay. <br />Vegetation analysis discussed below did not indicate that either of these two <br />Page 8 of 11 <br />02/09/00 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.