Laserfiche WebLink
below. Depending on <br />timing, and access points to the target sampling area, the field crew <br />would occasionally layout a set of points along coordinates in one direction and then sample them in <br />reverse order. However, orientation protocol was always maintained (i.e. in the direction of the next <br />point to be physically sample <br />length of a transact, the ori~ <br />transact could be completed. <br />unit by "bouncing" off the <br />(clockwise) of the ground coy <br />trampled vegetation. <br />Ground cover at each <br />illustrated on Figure 1 <br />instrumentation it has p <br />of 10 meters length was axle <br />If the boundary of an area was encountered before reaching the full <br />ttion of the transect was turned 90° in the appropriate direction so the <br />this manner, boundary transacts were retained entirely within the target <br />mdaries. Production quadrats were always oriented 90° to the right <br />transed and placed one meter from the starting point so as to avoid any <br />ple point was determined utilizing the point-intercept methodology as <br />As indicated on this figure, Cedar Creek utilizes state-of-the-art <br />to facilitate much more rapid and accurate collection of data. A transact <br />:d in the direction of the next sampling location from the flagged center <br />of each systematically located §ample point. At each one-meter interval along the transact, a "laser point <br />bar" was situated parallel to, ajid approximately 4.5 to s.0 feet vertically above the ground surface. A set <br />of 10 readings was recorded aj> to hits on vegetation (by species), litter, standing dead, rock (>2mm), or <br />bare soil. Hits were deterr <br />specialized lasers"' situated <br />intercepted by each of the nai <br />intercepts per transact were I <br />instrumentation facilitates the <br />possible. Identification and r <br />Flora: Western Sloce. <br />at each meter interval by activating a battery of 10 low-energy <br />I the bar at 10 centimeter intervals and recording the variable <br />focused (0.02' beams (see Figure 1). In this manner, a total of 100 <br />,d resulting in 1 percent cover per intercept. This methodology and <br />Lion of the most unbiased, repeatable, and precise ground cover data <br />:lature of plant species follows Weber and Wittman (1996) Colorado <br />~~ Lasers utilized for this instrument are stateof-the-art and of specializetl design to emit a unique eledro-magnetic <br />wavelength visible under full sunliilht, a wndition previously not possible with portable low~nergy lasers. <br />AA-3 <br />• <br />• <br />• <br />i <br />r, <br />r <br />r <br />