Laserfiche WebLink
that's because t~ different sets of information were sent at two <br />different times. The original application was sent in Oct. 1994 <br />(Nos. 2743-379-137 and 274J-379-139), and the revised maps were <br />sent in Jan., 1995 (Nos. 2743-379-152 and 2743-379-153). From your <br />review of the DMG files, do you agree that this is the correct <br />analysis of these receipts?"~ <br />For sake of argument, if the ORION PIT application is still <br />pending, why haven't you already "denied" Nielsons Inc.' <br />Application #M-97-020 (YOUNG GRAVEL SOURCE) since these <br />applications are for the same piece of property? We note that you <br />scheduled the decision date of YOUNG GRAVEL SOURCE before the <br />decision date for ORION PIT -- was that coincidental or are you <br />pursuing a common plan or design to deny ary sand and gravel <br />applications submitted by mineral owners? <br />we protest that you can now determine whether our permit is <br />adequate; DMG has waived that right by its inaction for 2 and 1/2 <br />years. We demand that you issue a permit for ORION PIT. <br />Furthermore, we insist that you provide a specific answer to each <br />of the questions noted above. <br />Sincerely, <br />~~~ ~ - <br />Charles G. Kinney <br />CGK/rr <br />cc: Client <br />Co-Counsel <br />Thomas Gillis <br />Division of Minerals and Geology <br />484 Turner Dr., Bldg. F, #101 <br />Durango, CO 81301 <br />00169 <br />