My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP51580
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP51580
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:56:17 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 1:07:06 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980004
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
10/23/1998
Doc Name
1997 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT MUNGER CANYON MINE C-81-020 MCCLANE CANYON MINE C-80-004
From
DMG
To
GRAND VALLEY COAL CO
Annual Report Year
1997
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
III IIIIIIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />1313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (3031 866-3567 <br />FAX: 1303) 832-8106 <br />October 23, 1998 <br />Mr. John Walters <br />Grand Valley Coal Company <br />P.O. BOX 70 <br />Loma, Colorado 81524 <br />RE: 1997 Annual Hydrologic Report <br />Munger Canyon Mine (C-81-020) <br />McClane Canyon Mine (C-80-004) <br />Dear Mr. Walters: <br />Roy Romer <br />Governor <br />lames S. Lochhead <br />Fxecutive Dlrecl0r <br />Michael g. Long <br />Division DIfeC10r <br />This letter is to advise you that the Division has completed review of the ] 996/1997 water year <br />annual hydrologic report for the McClane Canyon and Munger Canyon Mines, and we find that <br />the data presented in the report indicate that impacts aze generally in conformance with PHC <br />projections presented in the permit documents. <br />One suggestion we have for future AHRs, is that it would be helpful to have baseline water <br />quality data presented in the AHR tables for both surface water and groundwater information. <br />This could be done by simply adding another column of data, and would provide an easy way to <br />identify overall water quality trends. <br />Also, as you know, there are a couple remaining hydrology related matters (reclaimed channel <br />designs) still pending from McClane Technical Revision No. 9, for which we are awaiting <br />responses. I would like to get the issues resolved and issue a decision on the revision as soon as <br />possible, and prior to the midterm review date (January 4, 1999). I would therefore request that <br />you submit responses and revised designs by mid-November. <br />Please let me know if you have any questions. <br />Sincerel , <br />Dan T. Mathews <br />Environmental Protection Specialist <br />cc: David Berry <br />Mike Boulay <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.