My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50830
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50830
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:43 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:57:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996083
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/29/1999
Doc Name
BOWIE 2 MINE GOB PILE GEOTECHNICAL FIELD & LAB STUDY PN C-96-083
From
DMG
To
JOE DUDASH
Permit Index Doc Type
STABILITY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
3
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
r <br />Memo to Joe Dudash <br />Bowie #2 Mine -GOB Pile Density Study <br />page 3 <br />constructed. It appears, as earlier hypothesized, that a portion of the lowermost twenty feet of the <br />GOB was not placed in complete compliance with the relative density standard specification. <br />Does that represent a threat to the environment? Yes, it could. However, during each of my <br />visits to the site during the past year, including our visit earlier this month, 1 have observed the <br />toe and out slope of the GOB pile. I have not discerned any visible evidence of instability on the <br />GOB pile. I am also no[ aware of any failures on the facia] out slope of the pile. For this reason, <br />I do no[ consider [he GOB pile to represent an imminent threat. I cannot, however, discount the <br />possibility that some problem may develop in the future. <br />The brute force approach would be to require BRL to excavate and reconstruct the suspect <br />portion of the pile. Because the portion in question is the outer half of the basal zone this would <br />represent the excavation and reconstruction of the majority of the GOB volume. Since the pile is <br />now being removed for washing by Powderhorn Coal Company, this possibility is not as <br />improbable as it might normally be considered. <br />A less extreme approach might include: (1) Reevaluation of the pile using appropriately adjusted <br />material strength characteristics to reflect lower density, in order to determine whether the pile <br />as-built will be stable; (2) redesign of the pile, if necessary, to consider partial excavation and <br />reconstruction, andlor buttress addition; (3) submission and approval of an appropriate technical <br />revision; (4) implementation of the necessary reconstruction or design modifications; and, (5) <br />appropriate additional slope stability monitoring to verify success of the chosen remedial <br />techniques. <br />/' <br />cc: Larry Routten ~ / <br />y <br />doc: M:\COALUAP\Bow2Gob3.WPD <br />JP/jp <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.