My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50624
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50624
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:34 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:54:26 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981008
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
APPROVED HYDROLOGICAL MONITORING PROGRAM
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
_ AdiscussionoftheprobablehydrologicconsecjuencesandreGamationplanarecontainedinSection <br />1J 2.05.6(3) and Section 2.05.6(3)(b)(v) of the pemtit application document. The follov~ing discussion <br />• is intended to supplement the description of potential impacts of mining and mitigation of these <br />potential effects. The determination of significance has been made considering the impact on the <br />quality of the human environment, existing water uses, and the intended post mining land use of the <br />area. <br />Irderruption of grourxMater flaw and drawdov~n. In order to develop the impact assessment for <br />groundwater quantity, two different analyses techniques were utilized. First, pit inflowvolumes were <br />determined on an annual basis using an analytical approach developed by McWhorter, 1982. The <br />second analysis involved the determination of annual pit inflow rates and annual dravvdowns in the <br />adjacent overburden and coal aquifers as a result of the pit inflows. This analysis utilized the USGS <br />3-dimensional finite~fifference groundwater flow model MODFLOW. <br />Transient simulations were perfom~ed for afive-year period, using the maximum drawdown estimates <br />for the overburden and coal. These drawdown results are expressed as a maximum at the pit and <br />are expressed as a conical depression which results in decreased drawdown at further distance from <br />"~ the mine. For the overburden, the pit drawdown was 5 feet for years 1 and 2, 8 feet during year 3, <br />• 15 feet during year 4, and 30 feet during year 5. The drawdown for the coal simulation was 8 feet <br />during year 1, 5.8 feet during year 2, 6 feet during year 3, 7.3 feet during year 4, and 8 feet during <br />year 5. The zero impact contour for the overburden and coal after five years of mining is <br />approximately 4,000 feet. The overburden and coal drawdown contours do not intersect any of the <br />boundaries, therefore, no impact of the San Miguel River from drawdown in the deeper part of the <br />overburden or coal is predicted. Shallow aquifer Flow into Tuttle and Calamity Draws in the vicinity <br />of the pit vall be decreased, but vnll be offset by pumpage from the pit. Simulated average daily pit <br />inflow for the coal and overburden aquifers vaned from 1,255 cubic feet per day in year 1 to 5,604 <br />cubic feet per day in year 5. WFC's approach to these potential impacts is to monitor the aquifers <br />and discharge from the pit to determine the extent of drawdown. The hydrological monitoring <br />program should provide reasonably accurate measurements of effects of mining. Should the <br />monitoring show that impacts to the groundwater aquifers are precluding its use, WFC vlrill provide <br />alternate water sources of comparable quantity and quality. As described in the water augmentation <br />plan, WFC has a 114 acre foot consumptive use right on the Highline Canal which would be used <br />to mitigate the potential 26 acre foot impact on surface water right users from pit inflow drawrlown. <br />4r (Revised4S96) 2,p4.7.g3 <br />lJ <br />~:. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.