My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50288
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50288
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:20 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:48:48 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/29/2002
Doc Name
Request for Support on Excess Spoill Fill Reports Memo
From
KAG
To
BGW
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
14
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Lorencito Fill Report Review <br />May 29, 2002 <br />Page 9 of 14 Pages <br /> covered with excess spoil. The color photographs placed. Fill <br /> accompanying each certified report shall be taken in was being <br /> adequate size and number with enough terrain or other placed. <br /> physical features of the site shown to provide a relative <br /> scale to the photographs and to specifically and clearly <br /> identi the site. <br /> <br />Rule 4.09.1(13) If the disposal area contains springs, natural or manmade Yes. The <br /> watercourses, or wet-weather seeps, an underdrain system report states <br /> consisting of durable non-acid-forming and that there <br /> non-toxic-forming rock shall be constructed from the wet was no <br /> areas in a manner that prevents infiltration of the water evidence of <br /> into the spoil material. The underdrain system shall be springs or <br /> protected by an adequate filter and shall be designed and seeps. <br /> constructed using standard geotechnical engineering <br /> methods. <br /> <br />' By signature titles, Ronald G. Thompson was the inspector. The certification statement does not <br />say that Thompson was under the direct supervision of McGlothlin. There is a PE stamp on the <br />report. <br />z The report is dated February 23, 2002, but does not indicate the date of inspection. However, <br />the photographs are dated February 23, 2002. Your draft asks for dates of the inspections. <br />5 The report was dated February 23, 2002 but the date of inspection is not indicated. It was <br />received at the Division on Apri122, 2002. The submittal is not in compliance with this rule. <br />b By omission, one might infer compliance. However, better engineering practice would be to <br />include a statement that none exists. <br />Summary: I suggest you delete your draft statement that "No compaction data was collected or <br />indicted. The specifications only state that compaction will be by dozers and trucks. The report <br />states that this criterion was met. Your discussion on placement of fill in the photograph might be <br />softened by recommending the discussion of the picture be expanded to illustrate the 50-foot <br />zone being placed in horizontal layers and compacted by dozers and trucks (if such is the case in <br />the photograph). A dozer would then make a final dress of the fill as maybe shown. Recommend <br />the addition to your draft comments (Disposal of Excess Spill Fill Area #9 First Quarter 2002 <br />Certification February 23, 2002) the following: <br />Please add to the certification (page 2) that Ronald G. Thompson, a qualified professional <br />specialist experienced in construction of earth and rockfill embankments, accomplished the <br />inspection under the direction of Charles W. McGlothlin. <br />Please add the date of inspection to the report. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.