My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50243
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50243
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:18 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:47:52 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1983194
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/21/2003
Doc Name
Submittal of Geotechnical Reposts from 2002
From
Natural Soda Inc.
To
DMG
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I;d 13al:ci <br />April 8, 2(102 <br />' ('age 6 <br />~/ > 0.008 gal/sec It .......................................... <br />q > 0.08 gal/sec ft and drill hole <br />water level drops conspicuously ............... <br />lJpper limit of fracture zone <br />...........Upper limit of caved zone <br />Measurements of the hydraulic Cacture woe height for mining thicknesses up to 29 Ct are <br />summarized ilt Figure 9 for medium hard rock. "fable 1 presents formulas for predicting fi-aehlre <br />zone height based on the study. <br />Table 1. Formulas for Predicting Fracture Zone Heigh <br />Rock T e° Caved Zone Fractured Zone <br />YP ~.., t ~.., t <br /> 100 H 100 FI <br />Hard 2 <br />2.1 H+ 16 ± 'S 1.2 H+ 2.0 t 8.9 <br /> 1 <br />Medium Hard i 2.2 ~ 5.6 <br /> 4.7 H 19 H 3.6 <br />1.6 <br /> 1 <br />Soft 6.2 H 32 i 1'S H 5.0 ± 4.0 <br />3.1 <br /> 1 <br />Weathered 7,0 H 63 ± L2 H 8.0 ± 3.0 <br />S.O <br />° Ruck types are classified based on [heuniaxial compressive strength, C°: hard rock, C° > 5688 psi (39.23 <br />MPa); medium hard rock , Co = 2844-5688 psi (19.62-39.23 MPa); soft rock,Co < 2844 psi (19.62 MPa). <br />n la =minion hriaht - <br />Results of [he longwall study are particularly pertinent for estimating the potential for <br />aquifer leakage above Panels 1-2. Other approaches, as discussed in the 1995 AAI reportZ, are <br />useful for qualitatively describing caving effects. Only the Chinese approach includes <br />quantitative prediction of caving-related changes to hydraulic conductivity based on systematic <br />field measurements. The range of rock mass Types ("weak" to "hard"} suggests that the database <br />is applicable to a wide variety of conditions. The "soft" to "medium hard" rock types in Table 1 <br />are thought to be compatible with the low to moderate rock mass qualityg overlying Panels 1 <br />and 2. <br />Maximum cavity (mining) height is limited to 55 ft nominally in the vicinity of <br />Cavity #lA (Figure 1). This represents the total dissolution of uahcolite between the bottom of <br />the Boies Bed and the dissolution surface, which is possible given the life of the cavities. <br />Because nahcolite grade averages approximately 67% over this interval, the net maximum cavity <br />height is nominally 37 ft, assuming complete deposition of the insoluble fraction in the bottom of <br />the cavity and no bulking of the insolubles. Table 2 summarizes the predicted range of cave and <br />fracture heights fora 37-ft cavity (mining) height (h). <br />' a J.F.T. Agapito & Associates, Inc. (1988), "Core Hole Summary Report for NaTec-26-88-I, Piceance Creek Basin, <br />Colorado," Report [o NaTec Mines, Ltd., December. <br />Agapito Associates, Iltc. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.