Laserfiche WebLink
Binns, Janet <br />From: Hernandez, Dan <br />Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 2:30 PM <br />To: Gorham, Kent <br />Cc: Binns, Janet; Berry, David <br />Subject: Southfield Seeding <br />Kent -- Good work on catching Southfield's 2003 seeding errors on the Corley family property, and thanks for bringing this <br />to my attention today. <br />I've asked Janet to investigate the following: <br />1. Relative to each of Southfield's two (drilled and non-drilled) approved Corley property seed mixes, what are the <br />percentages of the two native species (Indian ricegrass and Bluebunch wheatgrass) that Southfield failed to use? Do <br />these two species make up a small, or a large, percent of each of the two approved overall mixes? <br />2. Relative to each of the two overall seed mixes actually used by EFCI last fall on the Corley property, what are the <br />percentages of the two introduced species (Crested wheatgrass and Intermediate wheatgrass) Southfield substituted? Do <br />these species make up a small, or a large, percent of each of the two overall mixes used? <br />3. Are the percentages of Crested wheatgrass and Intermediate wheatgrass high enough that those species could have <br />an adverse effect on Southfield's reclamation? If so, what (if any) on-the-ground mitigative measures would she suggest? <br />I appreciate your diligence in reviewing Southfield's ARRs. Again, good work. <br />Dan <br />