My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50216
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50216
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:17 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:46:58 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981034
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/25/1992
Doc Name
1991 AHR REVIEW RED CANYON
From
DMG
To
RED CANYON MINE FN C-81-034 AHR FILE
Annual Report Year
1991
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Red Canyon 1991 AHR Review <br />Page 4 <br />This is currently the only ground water monitoring that is <br />done. These piezometers are about 19 feet deep and are <br />completed into alluvium. Water levels for the piezometers <br />since 1983, are included on Table 4. There is a consistent <br />downward trend except for the spike during April 1989 and an <br />upward trend which begins in January 1991. However, the 1991 <br />Water Year data is still lower than the average water level. <br />The AHR states that the low water levels reflects the dry <br />conditions in the area and the lack of run-off reaching the <br />sediment pond. This explanation is acceptable. During <br />Division inspections, it has been noted that there is water in <br />the pond but is probably due to direct rainfall or snowfall. <br />Impact: There appears to <br />piezometers that <br />operation. <br />be no impact on the alluvial <br />could be attributed to the mine <br />Miscellaneous Comments <br />Table G lists all the piezometers on site, the outer diameter of <br />the pipe, the top elevation at the top of the casing, the ground <br />elevation, and the bottom elevation of the well. The table below <br />refers to the refuse piezometers. Because of additional refuse and <br />when the pile was reclaimed, more material was added and the top of <br />the casing had to be raised. The cumulative change in elevation <br />must be added to previous water levels in order to get the correct <br />level. <br />RCAHR <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.