My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50142
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50142
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:14 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:45:17 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1993041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/26/1987
Doc Name
DOWE FLATS AGRICULTURAL REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
The degree of competition between cattle and prairie dogs has <br /> not been fully assessed in research projects. However, Hansen <br /> and Gold (1977) showed that the proportions of different plant <br /> species consumed by prairie dogs and cattle were similar. Taylor <br /> and Loftfield (1924) concluded that zuni prairie dogs (cynomys <br /> gunnisoni zuniensis) destroy 80% of the total annual production <br /> of forage and may come into direct competition for forage with <br /> cattle. Summers and Linder (1977) determined that five impor- <br /> tant forage species for black-tailed prairie dog were bluegrama, <br /> and western wheat grass. Bonham and Lerwick (1976) found that <br /> plant species diversity and livestock use of plant species <br /> was greater on than off prairie dog towns. <br /> Boddicker (1983) concluded in his findings that prairie dogs <br />prefer areas of law vegetation and openness. In semiarid short- <br /> grass, mixed, and midgrass rangelands, they seem to prefer <br /> to establish colonies in old homestead sites and old fields. <br /> He found that prairie dogs do not tolerate tall vegetation <br /> well and avoid brush and timbered areas. Also, heavy live- <br /> stock grazing, compounded by exceptionally dry years, seems <br /> to enhance prairie dog expansion; whereas wet years with abun- <br /> dant vegetation growth produced the opposite effect. <br /> Dr. Boddicker, CSU Extension Wildlife Specialist, reported <br /> in a pamphlet titled "Prairie Dogs" that in the Western States <br /> large colonies of prairie dog may serve as a reservoir for <br /> bubonic plague. He states that this problem has been partic- <br /> ularly acute in Colorado and New Mexico. <br /> This writer notes that just last year (1986) bubonic plague <br /> wiped out an entire prairie dog preserve area (75 acres) and <br /> surrounding prairie dog populations at the Boulder Valley Ranch. <br /> The ranch is located approximately 12 miles south of Dowe Flats. <br /> This disaster caused a severe chain reaction of negative im- <br /> pacts to birds of prey and other wildlife that feed on prairie <br /> dogs in the preserve. A population crash of this magnitude <br /> on Dowe Flats would devastate the golden eagle and bald eagle <br />populations nesting in the nearby rock cliffs. The writer <br /> has personally observed several golden eagles preying on prairie <br /> dogs on five different occasions in pasture =9. In addition, <br /> he has observed bald eagles perched on electrical poles over- <br /> looking the prairie dog colonies in the same area. <br />The population of prairie dogs in field n9 appear to be out <br />of balance with its ecosystem and predator base. Prairie dog <br />population management and livestock grazing management need <br />to be addressed in a comprehensive management plan. <br /> <br />9 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.