My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50104
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50104
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:11 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:44:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981019
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/28/2004
Doc Name
2003 AHR Review for Compliance Memo
From
Byron Walker
To
File
Annual Report Year
2003
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
April 28, 2004 <br />Page 4 of 5 Pages <br />Rule 4.05.14(4)(c)(iii): If required by the Division, a written interpretation of the data and <br />identification of mining related impacts to the hydrologic balance. <br />The report is in compliance with this rule. The Division required no written interpretation ofthe data. <br />However, Colowyo has provided a general discussion of where monitoring reports are, and general <br />trends of changes in water quality. <br />One of the stream classifications (Colorado Division of Public Health and Safety) for Good Spring <br />Creek and Taylor Creek is agriculture. The Division identifies 1000 umhos/cm conductivity of <br />irrigation water as a suspect level for damage to vegetation. From the report, laboratory values of <br />Good Spring Creek above mining (at the New Upper Good Spring Creek monitoring station) average <br />(linear) in the 1500 range. At the Lower Good Spring Creek monitoring station, below mining, <br />laboratory values average (linear) in the 1700 range. Historically, average linear values have run <br />about 200 umhos/cm higher at the lower monitoring station. Conductivity has been rising over time <br />at both monitoring stations, slightly faster at the lower site. Average (linear) laboratory values of <br />conductivity at the Lower Taylor Creek monitoring station have risen, over time, from 1400 to 1800 <br />umhos/cm. <br />The probably hydrologic impact (PHC) from mining activities [Permit, page 2.05-75; Rule 2.05.6(2)] <br />is that "Surface water will not be significantly impacted in the mine area". The PHC continues <br />(Permit, page 2.05-75) "In summary, the Colowyo Mine will not significantly affect the hydrologic <br />balance or water quality of the general area or the permit area and the affect to the hydrologic balance <br />within the permit area will be insignificant. Temporary increases in TDS and associated common <br />ions are expected to affect quality in backfilled spoils within the permit area." From information <br />available at this time, this review concludes that the impacts on water quality and quantity from <br />mining activities as the Colowyo Coal Mine are within the probable hydrologic consequences as <br />permitted. <br />file: C-1982-0192003AHR <br />C:\bgw\My Documents\Colowyo\ahr & arr\ahr03rvw.doc <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.