My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP50071
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP50071
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:55:10 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:44:41 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981044
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
REGULATION OF COAL MINE SUBSIDENCE IN COLO
Permit Index Doc Type
SUBSIDENCE REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~ Chapter 75 <br />THE REGULATION OF COAL MINE SUBSIDENCE IN COLORADO III 'll'IIIIIIIII III <br />999 <br />James A. Pendleton, Ph.D. <br />Mined Land Reclamation Division, <br />Department of Natural Resources, State of Colorado <br />'bstract. In response to Public Law 95-87 <br />iM RA ,Colorado promulgated regulations <br />_overning the mining of Coal. These regulations <br />require the prediction, monitoring and mitigation <br />of "material damage" caused by subsidence. All <br />permitted underground coal mines within Colorado <br />ave approved subsidence programs. Preliminary <br />~nitoring results indicate the subsidence <br />~:echanical predictions have been sufficiently <br />accurate to preclude material subsidence damage. <br />.~e State of Colorado has developed a practical <br />approach to regulating subsidence, which stresses <br />monitoring verification of predicted subsidence <br />phenomena. However, shortcomings exist in our <br />rbility to precisely predict the secondary <br />consequences of subsidence, including effects to <br />•uctures, the hydrologic balance and the <br />_..oironment. lack of accuracy in predicting these <br />secondary consequences results in uncertainty, <br />necessitating conservatism in permitting. To <br />.:void increasingly stringent permit restrictions, <br />future research should emphasize the secondary <br />:onsequences of subsidence. <br />Introduction <br />Amendments to the Rules, including the subsidence <br />regulations were adopted by the Board in August of <br />1981. These regulations require the prediction, <br />monitoring and mitigation of "material damage" <br />caused by subsidence. <br />This paper describes the state regulations <br />pertaining to subsidence control. Examples are <br />cited from approved permits within the state. <br />Performance of the approved subsidence programs <br />are related for the past five years. <br />Technological short-comings and research <br />objectives are identified. <br />Colorado Subsidence Regulation <br />Two sections of the regulations of the Colorado <br />Mined Land Reclamation Board for coal mining are <br />dedicated to the regulation of subsidence. Rule <br />2.05.6(6) "Subsidence Survey, Subsidence <br />Monitoring and Subsidence Control Plan", presents <br />the requirements for the preparation of <br />subsidence-related portions of permit <br />applications. Rule 4.20, "Subsidence Control", <br />presents the subsidence performance standards <br />which all mines must satisfy. <br />The Legislature of the State of Colorado <br />adopted House Bill 1223, "The Colorado Surface <br />::oal Mining Reclamation Act" (The State Act), in <br />1979. This Act provided for the creation of a <br />state regulatory program as accommodated within <br />public Law 95-87, "The Surface Mining Control and <br />Reclamation Act of 1977" (SMCRA). Section <br />;4-33-121(2)(a) of the Colorado Revised Statutes <br />(CRS) and Section 516(b) of Public Law 95-87, <br />identically require the underground coal mine <br />operator to "Adopt measures consistent with known <br />technology in order to prevent subsidence causing <br />material damage to the extent technologically and <br />economically feasible, maximize mined stability, <br />and maintain the value and reasonably foreseeable <br />use of such surface lands, except in those <br />instances where the mining technology used <br />requires planned subsidence in a predictable and <br />controlled manner..." <br />On July 23, 1980, the Colorado Mined Land <br />7eclamation Board adopted regulations to <br />administer and enforce the State Act. <br />The requirements of the various sections of <br />Rule 2.05.6(6) will be discussed in detail <br />hereafter. Rule 4.20, the "Subsidence Control" <br />performance standards, are analogous to Sections <br />817.121 through 817.126 of the regulations of the <br />U. S. Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and <br />Enforcement (OSM). These performance standards <br />address the notification of potentially affected <br />property owners and residents, the protection of <br />surface owner's property and property values, and <br />the provision of buffer zones. Rule 4.20.4, which <br />addresses Buffer Zones, includes provisions for <br />protection of water bodies and impoundments, <br />aquifers which serve as water supply to public <br />water systems and public buildings, such as <br />"churches, schools, hospitals, courthouses and <br />government offices." The final paragraph of Rule <br />4.20.4 provides the Division the authorization to <br />"suspend underground coal mining under urbanized <br />areas, cities, towns and communities, and adjacent <br />to industrial and commercial buildings, major <br />impoundments or permanent streams, if imminent <br />danger is found to inhabitants." <br />101 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.