My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP49772
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP49772
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:53:50 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:40:33 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/11/2003
Doc Name
2002 Annual Hydrology Report
From
WWC Engineering
To
DMG
Annual Report Year
2002
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
94
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />' Aluminum/Unionized Ammonia/Ni[rite/Orthophosphate <br />All values obtained for Aluminum (Figure 14), unionized ammonia (Figure IS), and orthophosphate (Figure 17) <br />' have been low with most being below detection limits (Appendix A). The unionized ammonia concentration appeared [o drop <br />for the 1998-1999 monitoring period due [o the laboratory lowering the detection limit from 0.05 ppm to 0.01 ppm. In 2000, <br />' the laboratory raised the detection limit for unionized ammonia back to 0.05 ppm, then lowered [he detection back [0 0.01 <br />ppm in 2001. The nitrite concentration upstream of the mine at TR-A was 0.06 ppm in the July 2001 sample. The <br />concentration decreased as it passed by the mine site as a result of dilution. Samples collected in May and October 2001 <br />show nitrite levels at TR-A below [he detection limit. The apparent elevated aluminum level shown in May 1995, was due to <br />the laboratory lower detection limit being set at 0.2 ppm instead of 0.05 ppm. Aluminum was elevated at TR-C during the <br />' Aprit 2001 sampling period. However, concentrations downstream of TR-C are consistent with previous sampling results. <br />Therefore, either sample contamination or laboratory error is suspected. <br />' Orthophosphate showed some perturbation during the 2001 sampling period at TR-B. However, concentrations <br />' downstream of TR-B are consistent with previous sampling results. Therefore, either sample contamination or laboratory <br />error is suspected. <br />' Chloride/Po[assium/Iron <br />Chloride and potassium (Figure 18) were added to the monitoring program in 1993 while iron (Figure 19) was added <br />' in 1994. The concentrations of al{ of these parameters in Trout Creek water are generally low. <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />19 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.