My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP49531
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP49531
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:53:29 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:36:34 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981010
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
7/18/2005
Doc Name
2004 AHR Review Memo
From
Tom Kaldenbach
To
Janet Binns
Annual Report Year
2004
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Require- <br /> <br />Requirement Require-ment ment <br />complied <br />Comment <br /> citation with ? <br /> es/no <br />V. Minimization of <br />disturbance to the CDMG <br />hydrologic regulation yes <br />balance within 4.05.1(1) <br />and adjacent to <br />the ermit area <br />W. Prevention of Impacts to surface water outside permit area has been <br />material damage CDMG TDS loading of surface streams, and does not impair water <br />to the hydrologic regulation yes use. There are no data indicating impacts to an aquifer <br />balance outside 4.05.1(1) <br />outside the permit area. <br />the ermit area <br /> The only apparent major hydrologic impacts at Trapper <br /> are TDS loading of the following waters: No Name Gulch <br /> stream flow, ground water in spoil backfill at wells GF-7 <br /> and GF-I 1, and possibly the bedrock aquifer, and the 3rd <br /> White sandstone at well P-8. Although these are major <br /> impacts, they do not rise to the level of material damage <br />X. Agreement of CDMG because use or potential use is not impaired. Of these <br />observed regulation impacts, only the impact at well P-8 has not undergone <br />hydrologic 2.05.6(2) and final bond release. <br />impacts with requirement The TDS increase in No Name Gulch was addressed in <br />' <br /> <br />"probable to keep <br />es DMG's review of Trapper <br />s 1997 annual report (TR-78). <br /> <br />hydrologic information y TDS loading of ground water in the 3`d White Sandstone <br /> current, in well P-8 may be the result of suspected spoil leachate <br />consequences <br />(PHC) projected CDMG dischazging from A-pit 1100 ft. upgradient from the well. <br /> regulation Surface infiltration may affect the well because the well is <br />in mining permit 2 03.3(1) only 35 feet deep. The well monitors sandstone beds that <br /> probably aze permeable, and that may be in direct <br /> communication with the land surface. Well P-8 is 150 feet <br /> from a pond which has high inflows (East Pyeatt # I ). High <br /> nitrate content of samples may indicate the well receives <br /> infiltration of surface water. <br />Y. Adequacy of CDMG <br />ground water regulation yes <br />monitorin ro ram 4.05.13 1) <br />Z. Adequacy of CDMG <br />surface water regulation yes <br />monitoring 4.05.13(2) <br />ro ram <br />Page 7 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.