Laserfiche WebLink
Review Checklist for Annual Hydrology Report <br />Mine: Trapper Mine Date of review: 7/13/05 <br />Permit Ho.: C-81-010 DMG reviewer: Tom Kaldenbach <br />Report Year: 2004 <br />Submitted by: Trapper Mining Inc. <br />Date received <br />by Division: 3/18/05 <br /> Require- <br /> <br />Requirement Require-ment ment <br />complied <br />Comment <br /> citation with ? <br /> es/no <br />A. Filing frequency CDMG <br />of hydrology regulation yes <br />re ort 4.05.13 4)(c) <br /> March I S <br /> according to <br />B. Timely filing of Sections <br />hydrology report 4.8.5.1 and yes <br /> 4.8.5.2 <br /> permit C-81- <br /> O10 <br />C. Filing frequency <br />ofNPDES NPDES <br />Discharge permit CO- yes <br />Monitoring 0032115 <br />Re orts <br />D. Timely filing of NPDES <br />Discharge permit CO- yes <br />Monitoring 0032115 <br />Re orts <br />E. NPDES discharge p <br />P <br />Dm C Trapper did not exceed CDPS discharge limitations in 2004. <br />limitations e <br />rr <br />O- yes <br /> 0032115 <br />F. Basic Standards CWQCC <br />for Surface Water regulations yes <br /> 3.1.11 <br /> Trapper's discharges at several CDPS outfalls into <br /> drainages that are on Segment 3b of the Lower Yampa <br /> River. Trapper's CDPS discharge limitations are based on <br />G. Instream Numeric CWQCC which constituents in Trappers effluent are likely to cause <br />Standards regulation yes an exceedance of Segment 36's Instream numeric <br /> 3.3.0 standards. Trapper's discharges in 2004 complied with the <br /> dischazge limitations; therefore, it is reasonable to believe <br /> that Trapper's discharges did not violate Segment 36's <br /> Instream numeric standards. <br />Page 1 <br />