Laserfiche WebLink
livestock waterrng. The discussion mentions that all am,; fors praor to mining at the <br />Seneca II-W Mrne have exhibited several parameter concentrations in excess of both <br />irrigation and livestock standards compared, renderrng them questionable regarding their <br />sui tabrli ty for either irrigation or livestock. All bedrock aquifers affected by mining <br />have been determined to have transmrssivities less than 100 ftz/day, which would also <br />preclude their use for yieldrng sufficient water for irrigation, or even livestock. <br />Surface Water <br />At Seneca II-W, all stream antes (unle ea otherwise noted) are monitored monthly (excluding <br />Hovembex to February) for flow and field pazameters. Samples obtained at these si tee are <br />analyzed Eor the surface water parameter list, Table 7, during April, June, and September. <br />Springs are moor toned semiaanually (once in April-June, then again in September-November) <br />for flow, freld parameters, and, if flow exceeds Eive gpm, the surface rater pazameter <br />list. A summary of surface watez monitoring sites and sampling hie toty is presented in <br />Table 8. Monrtoring frequencres for surface water ai tes may be found on Page 15-3-2 of <br />the Seneca II-W PAP. <br /> All surface aster data is found in Appendix E. Data for each site in Appendix E begins <br /> ai th a floe hydrograph of all his [orrc data (plus an annual hydrograph for HPDES ar [es), <br /> followed by a listing o£ individual rater quality and quantity data for the current water <br /> year. After the water quality report is a statistics report representing baseline (i.a., <br /> preminang) data for each site downstream of mining (when avai labia). On this atatia tics <br /> report, "censored data" refers to analytical values that ware baba the detection limit, <br /> which rare canaored from the min/max/mean calculations. The time frame fox baseline <br /> condi Crone is listed under "conditions specified" at the bottom of each page. This is <br /> followed by a TDS regression plot u9ing the LOWESS method (ace the Ground Water Quality <br /> section), and a listing of historic percent milliequivalent values for major ions and TDS <br /> values. The range of values on the TDS plots is set automatically by a computer program <br /> and cannot be user defined. The following discussion of rater quality will limit itself <br /> to a description of TDS trends. A separate section, Comparison of Surface Water Quality <br /> to Hater Use Standards, will list those samples that exceed rater use standards. Lab <br /> samples are handled in a matter identical to what ras discuaead earlier in the ground <br /> water section. For Che Bake of brevity, the prafi: that precedes nil aurEaee rater site <br /> names will often be dropped throughout this report. Ae an example, Site SW-S2W-SG7 (HSH7) <br /> as 11 ba referred to ae Site 7. <br /> <br />