My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48747
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48747
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:52:32 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:23:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/24/2006
Doc Name
2005 Annual Reclamation Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Annual Reclamation Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
60
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
With the reduced seeding rate and the lack of aggressive species that establish quickly it was <br />necessary to consider erosion control on the treatment plots. Surface roughening using a dozer to create <br />depressions was included on several of the treatments. This treatment slows erosion and the depressions <br />create microhabitats that may enhance shrub establishment. <br />These demonstration plots are large-scale plots constructed with standard reclamation equipment <br />to test shrub establishment techniques that will have commercial practicality. At each mine, six <br />treatments are being evaluated. The treatments vary slightly between mines to accommodate the <br />reclamation techniques and material availability at each mine. Test plots for each treatment range in size <br />from 100 x 100 R at the Seneca Mine to 60 x 1000 ft at the Colowyo Mine. All seeded plots were drill- <br />seeded using standard equipment. At Colowyo Mine, no chains or other devises were used behind the <br />drill. This was done to create a broad range of conditions from buried seed to seed laying on the surface. <br />Colowyo Mine <br />The test plots at Colowyo are located in the East Pit, Section 11 area (UTM 13T 261304 <br />4458557} at an average elevation of 7480 feet. The selected site for the test plots has a northeast aspect. <br />The plots are located adjacent to each other in one contiguous block. Each treatment measures GO ft wide <br />and 1000 ft long (Figure 1). To alleviate soil compaction caused by scraper and truck traffic on the plots, <br />the non-topsoiled plots were ripped with a motor grader to a depth of 15 to 25 cm. After ripping, the non- <br />topsoiled plots and the 15 crrr topsoil plots were chisel plowed to smooth the areas. The study area was <br />then fertilized with 11-52-0 fertilizer at a rate of 375 lbs per acre. After fertilization, the entire study area <br />was chisel plowed to incorporate the fertilizer. A description of each treatment is presented below. <br />1. 18 inches (46 cm) of live-haul topsoil over spoil with strip seeding. The strip seeding included a <br />strip of native shrubs and native low~ompetitive forts that alternated with a strip of native <br />• grasses, forts, and shrubs. The seed mixtures for this treatrnent are presented in Tables 1 and 2. <br />The Table 1 mixture was placed in the left grass box of the rangeland drill, and the Table 2 mix <br />was placed in the right grass box. <br />2. 6 inches (15 cm) of live haul topsoil over spoil and seeded with native shrubs and low- <br />competitive native forts. Surface manipulations included to enhance soil moisture conditions. <br />The seed mixture for this treatment is presented in Table 1. <br />3. 6 inches (15 cm) of live-haul topsoil over spoil, strip seeded as described in No. I above. <br />4. Non-topsoiled spoil, strip seeded as described in No. 1 above. <br />5. Non-topsoiled spoil seeded with relatively unpalatable native shrubs, low-competitive native <br />forts, and low~ompetifive native grasses. See Table 3 for the seed mixture used in this <br />treatment. <br />Construction of the plots was conducted in the summer of 2000 (Figure 2) and seeding was <br />completed in October 2000. Fencing of half the study area was completed in the spring of 2002. <br />• <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.