Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~~ <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Third Party Oversight <br />San Luis Mine <br />5.1 LOW-PERMEABILITY LAYER <br />18 <br />5.0 LINER SYSTEM <br />Water, Waste & Land, Inc. <br />January 10, 1993 <br />The San Luis tailings disposal facility was designed with a low permeability layer which <br />would exhibit a maximum permeability of 1 x 10'5 centimeters per second Icm/sec) (SRK, <br />1993a1. The original specifications for this material type required that the final in-place <br />density be at 95 percent of maximum dry density, compacted at minus 2 per cent to plus 3 <br />percent of optimum moisture content. ~ <br />During Raise I Expansion, the moisture specification was revised to use low moisture <br />contents (up to 6 percent dry of optimum) at which the material was being compacted to <br />stiffen the condition of the compacted material before the installation of the VLDPE liner (SRK, <br />1993c). Preliminary field permeability (BAT) tests confirmed that the target permeability of <br />1 x 10-5 cm/sec was being achieved and exceeded regularly at the low moisture content. BAT <br />permeability test results available at the time of the initial site visit ranged from 3.3 x 10'6 to <br />1.3 x 10-a cm/sec (SRK, 1993c). The average value for all tests was 6.3 x 10' cm/sec. <br />Confirmatory laboratory permeability tests are still in progress. <br />Final field permeability (BAT) tests confirmed that the target permeability of 1 x 10-5 <br />cm/sec was exceeded regularly. Final BAT permeability test results ranged from 7.0 x 10-6 <br />to 1.3 x 10'a cm/sec (BMRI, 1993r). The average value for all tests was 8.7 x 10' cm/sec. <br />The only time that WWL observed the installation and in-situ testinc of the low <br />permeability liner was during the initial site visit on October 28. On November 11, the first <br />day of third-party oversight inspection, the placement of the low permeability material and <br />VLDPE liner had been completed. Preliminary QA test results were reviewed and the BAT <br />permeability test results were consistently lower than the required 1 x i0'S cm/eec specified <br />in the design report (SRK, 1993c1. <br />5.2 SYNTHETIC LINER <br />Although very little VLDPE liner installation was observed, QA test results were <br />acceptable. Liner repairs were required due to several failed seams and numerous holes <br />created during snow and ice removal. Areas where such activities occurred were inspected <br />by field QA personnel and were patched and tested by the liner installation subcontractor. <br />All activities were observed by the field oversight engineer. Although difficult in cold, wet and <br />dusty weather, results of the seaming and patching operations were acceptable. <br /> <br />