My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48441
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48441
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:52:09 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:19:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/7/1992
Doc Name
1991 Annual Hydrologic Report
Annual Report Year
1991
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
of the water fits. As a result, excess water shows up at <br />• location 10. To calculate total inflows the 1990 value for <br />location 10 is used in the calculation to exclude excess water <br />from location 5. Most of the inflows associated with location 2 <br />were under water at the North fan seal. Location 22 was the pool <br />of water at the north fan created as the water level rose behind <br />the seal. The mass average pH for the mine inflows was 8.5 and <br />the mass average conductivity was 900 umhos/cm. <br />• <br />The mine inflows from the Cameo Mine were all discharged to the <br />surface. The water in the sealed No. 1 East Mains is drained at <br />a variable rate, therefore, the higher flow calculated at <br />Location 8 may not represent the actual inflows. As shown on <br />Table 591-6, the inflows varied seasonally. The flows shown for <br />locations 1 and 8 in the Cameo Mine appear to be the reverse of <br />the 1990 flows. Errors are easy to make because location 1 is a <br />difficult location to measure and location 8 is calculated. The <br />mass average pH for the inflows study was 8.5 and the mass <br />average conductance was 2921 umhos/cm. The average pH and <br />conductance for the total discharge were 8.6 and 2633 umhos/cm. <br />CONSUMPTIVE IISE <br />A monthly listing of domestic water usage is shown on Table <br />C91-1. Meter 1 supplies the buildings near the Roadside entrance <br />gate. Meter 2 supplies the preparation plant and the Roadside <br />office and bathhouse. Meter 3 supplies the Cameo facilities. <br />The split between the surface facilities and the plant is not <br />measured, therefore estimates are made. The leak repaired in the <br />fall of 1940 shows up as lower surface facilities use than in the <br />1990 report. <br />Mine water is used underground for dust suppression in the mining <br />process and on roadways. Water usage underground is not <br />measured, but is being estimated. The mine water is also used <br />for process water in the preparation plant. The plant has a <br />closed circuit for water but leaves the plant as added moisture <br />in the coal and the refuse. As shown on table C91-1 the mine <br />water usage in the plant was metered this year. <br />The water added to coal during the mining process and the <br />cleaning process can be roughly calculated from moisture levels <br />at different stages of the process. The following information is <br />used to make the calculation: <br />- Measured equilibrium moisture 7.43$ <br />- Measured raw tons 384,355 with an estimated <br />moisture of 10$ <br />- Measured clean tons, 210,929, with a measured <br />moisture of 10.69$ <br />- Estimated refuse tons, 192,000, with an <br />estimated 18$ moisture <br />i• <br />The moisture added during mining calculates out to be 2.380 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.