My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP48054
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP48054
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:51:53 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 12:13:04 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1994082
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/31/2005
Doc Name
2004 Revegetation Monitoring Report
From
Seneca Coal Company
To
DMG
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
70
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Sample points were located in the field using topographic maps. Cover and woody plant density <br />transects were located and oriented using a blind throw of a meter stick. The final location of <br />each herbaceous production plot was chosen randomly, associated with each cover/woody plant <br />density transect. At each coverlwoody plant density sampling location, the slope (percent) and <br />aspect of the site (in degrees not corrected for magnetic declination) were determined and <br />recorded, as was the orientation of the transect (in degrees not corrected for magnetic <br />declination). <br />SAMPLE ADEQUACY CALCULATIONS <br />Sample adequacy calculations for parameter estimation without hypothesis testing were carried <br />out using the formula as prescribed by the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for <br />parameter estimation without hypothesis testing (DMG 1995): <br />~z Sz <br />Nmin= <br />(d x ~z <br />• where: <br />to =one-tailed t-value with (n-1) degrees of freedom, a=0.10 <br />sZ =sample variance <br />d = 0.1 (0.15 for woody plant density) (level of precision or desired detectable reduction) <br />x = sample mean <br />CONFIDENCE LIMITS <br />Confidence limits for comparisons to reference areas and technical standards were calculated <br />using a 1-tailed t-value for alpha error probability of 0.10 at (n-1) degrees of freedom multiplied <br />by the standard error of the mean of the sampled area. <br />C.I. = t, s <br />~In) <br />Pertormance Standards <br />COVER and HERBACEOUS PRODUCTION : For purposes of comparison only, cover and <br />• herbaceous production performance standards were calculated in accordance with procedures <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.