Laserfiche WebLink
The total inflow measured July 29, 1987 did not include inflow from the <br />fault system in the west portion of the No. 5 Mine, because that area had <br />been sealed. The west sealed area had produced the majority of the water <br />measured in the past inflow studies. Table 8 - 1987 Inflow With West Side <br />Inflow Estimates presents four different scenarios by which the inflow <br />from the western portion of the mine may be estimated. Including the <br />estimated inflows from the west portion of the No. 5 into the 1987 inflow <br />study shows that the inflow estimates are between 73 percent and 85 <br />percent of the metered weekly average record, as shown in Table 8, below. <br />Table 8 - 1987 Inflow With West Side Inflow Estimates <br /> Metered <br /> Inflow Measurements (gpm) Discharg e (gpm) 1) Percent <br /> (A) (8) (C) (D) (E) 2) (F) 3) (G) <br />Year West East Total Week To Date Week To Date <br />1985 430 44 470 820 730 57 64 <br />1986 390 240 630 270 590 230 110 <br />1987 SEALED 84 84 600 560 14 15 <br />1987 4) <br /> 430 84 510 600 560 85 91 <br />1987 5) <br /> 410 84 490 600 560 82 88 <br />1987 6) <br /> 390 84 480 600 560 80 86 <br />1987 7) <br /> 350 84 440 600 560 73 79 <br />NOTES: <br />1) Percent of Metered Discharge which was measured as Inflow <br />2) F=C/ Dx 100 <br />3) G=C/Ex 100 <br />4) = 1985 inflow from west <br />5) = Average of 1985 and 1986 inflow from west <br />6) = 1986 inflow from west <br />7) = 1986 inflow from west minus the difference t~etween the 1985 <br />and 1986 inflows from the west <br />1.6 Conclusions <br />The study reveals that conditions within the mine are remaining <br />essentially the same as during the prior years. That is, the eastern <br />8 <br />