Laserfiche WebLink
• • J . • <br />5. The type and approximate quantity of fertilizers, organic material or soil conditions <br />used and location of use. <br />RESPONSE: <br />No fertilizers, organic material or soil conditioners were used during the last year <br />at Mesa Gravel Pit. <br />6. An appraisal of the success or reclamation efforts and in the event of failure of any <br />efforts, a short narrative on the suspected or determined cause of such failure. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Observations indicate that reclaimed areas exhibit good vegetative cover which is <br />adequately controlling erosion. <br />Tri State Generating Company constructed a road through an area that was topsoiled <br />and seeded in the fall of 1985. This road has been revegeta ted. <br />7, Estimates of the location and number of acres to be affected in the coming year. <br />RESPONSE: <br />Exhibit D-1, Mining Plan, shows the anticipated direction of mining. At the present <br />time, mining has not advanced as far as proposed on Exhibit D-1. This is due to low <br />production. Our proposed rate for the coming year should reach the 49,000 tons as <br />permitted. The anticipated disturbance for 1968-1989 is: <br />Area <br />Acres <br />Active pit advance 3.0 <br />Topsoil removed in advance of pit 1.0 <br />8. The effective date of this information provided above shall be no more than 45 days <br />prior to the anniversary date. <br />RESPONSE: <br />For the sake of continuity, the effective date of this information is from June 1, <br />1987 to June 1, 1988. <br />