REP47308 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Page 2 7. Figure 20 displays wells 001-SP-1, 2, and 3. Where are these wells in the monitoring plan? Response: The wells were incorrectly labelled. They should have 0~ been 026-SP-1, 2, and 3. Figure 20 has been corrected. Why are 1991 values not represented on Figure 34? Response: The 1991 data was included on the graph, but due to the ~~,~~ orientation of the labels on the x axis, the 1991 date did not print out. The x axis labels have been re-oriented so that the 1991 date is displayed. ~,r 9. Tables 2 and 3 were not included in the report. Response: Copies of Tables 2 and 3 are being supplied. 10. In future reports refer to springs as shown on the map rather than by the use of the cryptic seven digit in-house codes. I!k ~~' Response: In the future Table 49 will include the spring common IUnn"~ ~, names. '7-1 11 No common names were provided for 5868901, 6862014, 5863030, 03001, OVBITD, and Area 41. ~~ Response: A cross reference of spring names is being provided. 12 Mine 1 seep comp near TS pile, FCBH near fan, P-2, Area 31-AA, rl~,+,~ ne 2 PG 6-1 above stockpond, FCBH seep below bench, These ~1 ^/,'b_rX `' I springs are not spotted on the Map (Figure 3) . ~ Response: The missing springs have been added to the Map (Figure nV1~~ 3). Spring Area 31-AA was incorrectly labeled Area 31-1 on the 1° Map. ;ry,Q~ ~'~" 13. No data was submitted for the following springs: 60-1, 60-2, ~JU I 60-3, U, V, M2PS1, M2PS2, MIC, 31-1. ~, Response: These springs did not flow during the 1993 Spring survey f and should not have been shown on the map. They have been removed from the revised map. 14. Table 38 is a repeat of Table 37. Table 40 is a repeat of Table 39. 6IL Response: Tables 38 and 40 have been corrected. 15: Table 51 appears to be spring E. ~~ Response: Table 51 has been corrected to represent Spring D comp.