My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP47025
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP47025
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:28 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:39:12 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980007
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Name
HISTORIC RECORD STUDY AREA BASELINE CHARACTERIZATION 1996 PRECIPITATION SOILS VEGETATION WEST ELK MI
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
37
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
V. SAMPLING METHODOLOGY <br />AGENCY COORDINATION <br />On July 2, 1996, Michael Savage met with Mr. Larry Routten of CDMG to discuss <br />development of historic record revegetation success criteria at the West Elk Mine. <br />Based on a review of the proposed historic record concept for the West Elk Mine, <br />CDMG endorsed the historic record proposal in concept. CDMG suggested further <br />discussion on se]ecton of the historic record area (the selection process was detailed <br />earlier), determination of specific average parameters, characterization of climatic data, <br />and management of grazing at the study area. On July 23, 1996, CDMG, MCC, and <br />Savage and Savage representatives met at the West Elk Mine to further discuss the <br />historic record concept. During this meeting, the available locations for the historic <br />record vegetation community were evaluated, and the remaining issues were addressed. <br />Sampling of the historic record vegetation community occurred in August 1996 as did <br />sampling of the historic record study area soils. The historic record concept and plan <br />for development of the historic record revegetation success criteria were approved by <br />CDMG in a permit revision (PR07). <br />MAPPING <br />Prior to initiation of field work, the permit document, aerial photos, and applicable <br />maps were reviewed to evaluate topography, geology, soils, and large scale vegetation <br />communities. A map of the study area at 1:1200 scale (1"=100') was constructed <br />from aerial photography to delineate the study area and establish random sample point _. <br />locations. On a gridded overlay of the map, a Cartesian coordinate grid (10x10 feet) <br />was established. Computer generated random numbers were used to establish a pool of <br />random x,y coordinates. Fifty random sample locations were established within the <br />study area. Sample sites were located in the field through compass triangulation and <br />pacing from known landmarks. Transect orientation was randomly determined by a <br />spinner. Figure 1 illustrates the 1996 vegetation and soil sample point locations in the <br />study area. <br />FIELD SAMPLING <br />Timing <br />Vegetation sampling was conducted August 6 and 7, 1996. This time period coincided <br />with maximum biomass development of the majority of plant species and occurred <br />during or immediately after anthesis of the majority of herbaceous flowering species. <br />Herbaceous production sampling occurred prior to significant drying of graminoid and <br />fort species. Soil sampling of the study area was conducted on August 1, 1996. Light <br />grazing by horses has historically occurred in the study area and other cleared areas on <br />-8- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.