Laserfiche WebLink
n <br />U <br />MINREC, INC., RED CANYON MINE <br />1991 ANNUAL HYDROLOGIC REPORT <br />HYDROLOGIC YEAR 10/90 - 9/91 <br />The reclamation of the Red Canyon mine site was performed <br />during 1988. Sedimentation control for the site is accomplished <br />with a sediment pond and the use of alternate sediment control <br />for a small area exemption. Both systems worked effectively <br />during the year. No run-off water was discharged from the site <br />during the ,year. <br />This year's report is formatted the same as the 1987, 1988, <br />1989 and 1990 reports. Monitoring values are compared with the <br />average of previous values for the same month which generally in- <br />clude monitoring results from 1981 through 1990. The averages <br />shown in this report are slightly different from prior years <br />reports because the 1990 monitoring results are included in the <br />averages. <br />As a result oi' a technical revision approved September 5, <br />1989, required hydrologic monitoring of the area around the mine <br />• site has been reduced. Current monitoring requirements are shown <br />on pages 144 and 144a of the Permit. The location of the <br />monitoring sites is shown on Map 2.05.6(31-1 The ne~a monitoring <br />program ,cent into effect during the 1990 water ,year. <br />SURFACE WATER <br />Table S-91 shows the surface water monitoring results for <br />this water year compared to the averages of previous ,years <br />monitoring results for the same month. <br />According to the local irrigation office, 1991 was a below <br />average year for snowpack and run-off. However, the 1991 water <br />year produced more run-off than the three prior years. The land <br />owners are still hoping for an above average year to make up for <br />the prior three dry years. <br />Spot flow readings taken in May will vary because of the <br />timing and intensity of snow melt. The May flows in Ward Creek <br />were substantially lower than prior years averages. However, the <br />measured flow at Upper Ward Creek of 12.3 cfs was nearly double <br />the flow measured during the prior three years. <br />The late season flow in the creeks is augmented by reservoir <br />discharge. The September flow in Ward Creek was low but about <br />• what would be expected for a dry year and the flow was relatively <br />close to its historic average. <br />