My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46788
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/20/2000
Doc Name
1999 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1999
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />' iV. GROUND WATER <br />GROUND WATER ELEVATIONS <br />Water levels in the alluvial wells at the Edna Mine have remained constant over the period of record with minor <br />Fluctuations occurring seasonally. Elevations of the water in the alluvial wells and the West Ridge spoils well are shown in <br />' Figure 20. in reviewing the data, it is apparent that the spoils well (WR-I) has reached steady state and exhibits consistent <br />seasonal Fluctuations. The seasonal fluctuations result from spring snowmelt causing a mounding of water in the perched <br />' aquifer which drains over the summer via discharge from a spring on the lower portion of West Ridge near the elevation of <br />Trout Creek. <br />GROUND WATER QUALITY <br />' Comparisons of water quality data gathered from the alluvial wells at the Edna Mine must be exercised with caution <br />due to the differing stratigraphic units intersected along Trout Creek adjacent to the various wells. The alluvium in the <br />' vicinity of Well TR-I.5 intersects stratigraphy above the Wadge coal seam while the alluvium in the vicinity of TR-3 <br />intersects stratigraphy below the Wadge seam. Alluvium in the vicinity of TR-4 intersects even lower siratigraphic units than <br />' those at TR-3. The influence from contact with the differing lithologies can not be quantified; therefore, differences between <br />the wells may not be responses to mining related activities. <br />Temperature/pH <br />Temperature (Figure 21) and pH (Figure 22) in 1999 followed the expected trends with temperature exhibiting <br />' typical seasonal Fluctuations and pH remaining relatively constant over the monitoring period. The amount of temperature <br />Fluctuation in Well WR-1 is somewhat greater than expected suggesting the flow to the perched aquifer, although subsurface, <br />' is very shallow. <br /> <br />1 <br />1J <br /> <br />27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.