My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46788
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46788
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:50:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:18:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/20/2000
Doc Name
1999 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1999
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br />1 <br /> <br />1 <br />1 <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />Bicarbonate/Sulfate <br />As noted in previous annual hydrology reports, upstream of the mine on Trout Creek, bicarbonate (Figure 10) is the <br />major anion with sulfate (Figure II) concentrations increasing rapidly along the mine area to become predominating <br />downstream (Figure 12). The sulfate levels increase is most markedly noticed prior to the peak Flow period of Trout Creek <br />and adjacent to where mining activity took place, as are TDS levels in general. This increase is probably caused by early <br />runoff at the mine site leaching pyritic and organic sulfur as Flow passes over and through the spoils. Since the flow of Trout <br />Creek is low at that time, the amount of sulfur is sufficient to cause an ionic shift from a bicarbonate type water to a sulfate <br />type. During periods of higher Flow and late in the season when runoff from the mine is small relative to total Trout Creek <br />Flow, the sulfate component is less able to shift the anion balance to a sulfate type with concentrations of bicarbonate and <br />sulfate being approximately equal downstream. <br />The 1997-1999 vend shows that the topological change generally still occurs at TR-B. This is believed to be the <br />result of the spoil spring which has developed at the base of the West Ridge mining area. As reclamation of West Ridge <br />matures, [he high levels of sulfur exhibited in the spring are anticipated to decrease. The 1997-1999 trend showing peak <br />sulfate levels at TR-C and TR-D are expected to continue for some time as spoil springs in the Moffat area have developed <br />after the completion of mining in that area. Like the West Ridge area the sulfate sources within the Moffat area are <br />anticipated to diminish as vegetation establishes and matures. <br />While peak levels of individual constituents may be shifting as flow proceeds past the mine, [hey do not seem to be <br />increasing overall and it is believed that an equalization in the sulfate-bicarbonate balance or a reversal (similar to the balance <br />at TR-A) occurs downstream as the source of available sulfate (mining areas) is unavailable and dilution by runoff from <br />undisturbed areas is introduced. <br />Manganese <br />Manganese (Figure 13) shows fairly consistent values since 1989. All the manganese values observed are consistent <br />with the baseline values. Manganese values from 1992 through 1999 appear to be developing a vend, which may be directly <br />related to flow in Trout Creek as are the TDS concentrations. <br />14 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.