My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46451
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46451
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:49:38 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:10:13 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
REPORT
Doc Date
3/27/2007
Doc Name
2006 AHR Review
From
Dan Mathews
To
Sandy Brown and Mike Boulay
Annual Report Year
2006
Permit Index Doc Type
Hydrology Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF RECLAMATION, MINING AND SAFETY <br />Department of Natural Resources <br />7 313 Sherman St., Room 215 <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 <br />Phone: (303) 866-3567 <br />FAX: (303) 832-8106 <br />DATE: March 27. 2007 <br />TO: Sandy Brown and Mike Boulay <br />FROM: Dan Mathews <br />RE: 2006 Water Year Annual Hydrology Report <br />Seneca II-W Mine, Permit No. C-1982-057 <br />COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF <br />RECLAMATION <br />MINING <br />- &- <br />SAFETY <br />Bill Ritter, fr. <br />Governor <br />Harris D. Sherman <br />Executive Director <br />Ronald W. Cattany <br />Division Director <br />Natural Resource Trustee <br />I have completed an initial review of the 2006 AHR for Seneca II-W. As usual, the report was thorough and <br />comprehensive. Monitoring appears to have been conducted in compliance with permit specified schedules <br />at approved sites, and the report includes appropriate data presentation and discussion/evaluation of <br />observed compliance with relevant standards and PHC projections. <br />As in previous years, there are a few exceedances of water use standards at several sites, for various <br />parameters. Also, as noted last year, there are a few wells that had TDS values exceeding PHC projections. <br />I will let the reviewing hydrologist evaluate the significance of these exceedances. <br />Also, it appears that the PHC review has not yet been done for last year's report (see my preliminary review <br />memo dated April 11, 2006). So, I need to request PHC review by a hydrologist for both the 2005 and 2006 <br />Seneca II-W AHR's. <br />Office of Office of <br />Mined Land Reclamation Denver • Grand Junction Durango Active and Inactive Mines <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.