My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46449
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46449
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:49:38 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 11:09:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980003
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
5/22/1980
Doc Name
YAMPA COALS CCESS SPOIL PILE
From
MLR
To
RICK MILLS
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
STATE OF COLORADO RiCHnRn D. Gove~~ai ~~~ ~~~ll~~j~l~lj1lj <br />DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />Harris D. Sherman. Executive Director ggg <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION <br />723 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street <br />Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 8923567 <br />May 22, 1980 <br />TO: Rick Mi11s <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton /// ~~ <br />RE: Yampa Coal's cess it Pile <br />•M <br />Hamlet J. Barry, III, <br />Director <br />Rs we observed at the site Wednesday, May 14th, the excess spoil pile <br />at Yampa Coal's strip pit requires some remedial treatment. The major <br />problem appears to be oversteepening of the outslopes of the spoil piles. <br />Sma11 zones of tension cracking, indicative of slope instability, were <br />evident throughout the outer periphery along the top of the pile. One <br />major area of observed cracking and possible slope bulging was observed <br />on the "reclaimed"face of the pile facing their office area. While <br />the company's representatives insisted that the angle of slope ranged <br />from 5:1 to 3:1 (horizontal to vertical) throughout this area, my <br />visual perception leads me to believe that actual slope angle was closer <br />to 2:1 to 4:1. <br />Unless the company is willing to submit an appropriate stability analysis <br />to verify the disposal pile's slope stability at steeper angles, 2 suggest <br />that you require reduction of the pile's slopes to an angle no greater than <br />3:1 throughout. Particular and immediate care should be required on that <br />portion of the northern face of the pile which lies above the undisturbed <br />mountain valley of the adjoining areas. I suggest that the topsoil <br />should be removed, the slope regraded to 3:1, the subsoils properly compacted, <br />the surface roughened, the topsoil reapplied, and the slope revegetated <br />as promptly as is practicable. Throughout the remaining areas of the excess <br />spoil pile's slope, final grading should be capable of achieving a more <br />stable slope configuration. Until that time, the marginally stable <br />conditions of the end-dumped spoil pile will probably constitute a major <br />operational incronvenience for the operator. Under the permanent proposed <br />regulations, the end-dumping technique of material placement will be <br />disallowed, unless an experimental practice permit is obtained from Yampa <br />Coal. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.