My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46240
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46240
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:49:19 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:51:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982056
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
6/5/1986
Doc Name
1985 AHR Review Letter
From
DMG
To
Twentymile Coal Company
Annual Report Year
1985
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
4
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Mr. Richard Mills - 3 - June 5, 1986 <br />Detection limits for four elements were not low enough to ascertain <br />whether the water was meeting stream standards. <br />Comparison of Detection Limits and Receiving Steam Standards <br />Receiving Stream <br />Element Detection Limit Standard <br />Mercury < 0.0005 0.00005 <br />Cadmium <0.005 0.001 <br />Molybdenum < 0.05 0.01 <br />Copper* <0.02 0.01 <br />*Copper detection levels for sites covered by the basic <br />Hydrologic Monitoring Plan were inadequate. However <br />detection levels for the Area 2 Pit/Pond D study are <br />acceptable. <br />Interpretation <br />Bedrock Aquifer Well Monitoring <br />The wells in the Wadge overburden and Twentymile sandstone did not <br />appear to show any potentiometric changes attributable to mining. The <br />hydrographs for 006-82-48 and 006-82-48A were helpful. It would be <br />appreciated if hydrographs of all wells could be included in future reports. <br />The hydrograph of well 006-82-48A did not show a consistent seasonal pattern, <br />contrary to TCC'c analysis, but rather a series of fluctuations between 1982 <br />and 1984 that have no correspondence with annual cycles. Are you aware of any <br />pumping that went on in the vicinity during that period? <br />Well 006-81-31 has much higher salt levels than other Wadge overburden <br />sites. Has this well been examined to ascertain that it was completed <br />properly? Do you have any other explanations for the high salt concentrations? <br />Is well 006-81-30 an artesian well? The remarks column annotates the <br />failure to provide depth data with the comment "flowing". Please elaborate. <br />Foidel Creek Alluvial Aquifer Well Monitoring <br />The Foidel Creek alluvial wells do not show any definite effects from <br />mining from the hydrographs presented. However, future hydrographs should <br />have an expanded abscissa of 20 feet rather than 35 feet. It is expected that <br />water levels should rise in late summer with Foidel Creek's transition from an <br />ephemeral to a perennial stream. Salt concentrations in the aquifer declined <br />during the last two years at the downstream site, but increased at the two <br />upstream sites, It there a comparable dilution effect in adjacent surface <br />water sites as one proceeds downstream through the permit area? <br />Fish Creek Alluvial Aquifer Well Monitoring <br />Twentymile Coal Company submitted a graph of the potentiometric surface <br />of a series of wells at the Fish Creek Tipple. This graph showed quarterly <br />water levels from 1985 and fall quarter data from 1980. A comparison of 1980 <br />and 1985 fall quarter data showed an increase in water level on the disturbed <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.