Laserfiche WebLink
X09-18-1995 10~43RM FROM SRURGE RIJD SRURGE TO 8328106 P.04 <br />establish wildlife cover clumps and hiding area. The practical [teed for determining <br />woody plant densities in the undisturbed area is moot. However, if necessary we <br />would,propose to take a maximum of fifteen 50 square meter belt ttansects to be <br />aligned with the cover transects. 'This parameter would not be subject to sample <br />adequacy requirements. <br />Semple Adequacy <br />Sample adequacy calculations will be made for both vegetative cover and herbaceous <br />production sampling of the oakbtvsh community. The following formula will be used <br />for these calculations: <br />(t)2 (s)2 <br />nmin = - (d Xyaz)2 <br />where: n~ =minimum sample size <br />t =the Student's t distribution value at the 95~ confidence level <br />s =sample standard deviation (s)2= sample variance <br />d = pettertt acceptable deviation from the mean (1096) <br />Xbaz =sample mean <br />Sample adequacy will be calculated for vegetation cover and herbaceous production <br />sampling to a maximum of fifty (50) cover transacts or production plots. Lf sample <br />adequacy is indicated by less than the maximum number of transacts or quadrats, <br />sampling will be considered adequate for that parameter. Parameters will be tested at <br />the 9596 confidence level. Confidence levels achieved for each parameter will be <br />calculated and reported. <br />WETLAND COMMUNITY <br />The existing wetland community in the proposed expansion area is hypothesized by Wright <br />Water Engineers to be a remttant oxbow of the Notch Pork of the Gunnison River which has <br />been completely cut off from the river by construction for the "new" State Highway 133 <br />alignmeat on the south side of the river. This area has bcen mapped and described in <br />accordaace with U.S. Army Carps of Engineers requirements for delineating jurisdictional <br />wetlands. As this community is small in size (0.3 acres), it qualifies as a minor vegetation <br />community, as defined by CDMG guidelines. We propose to provide a qualitative description <br />of this vegetation cotttmunity for baseline vegetation requirements. <br />We discussed the need far sampling the aakbrush reference azea at the mine to compare to the <br />undisturbed oakbrush in the proposed expansion area. As we both acknowledged, the <br />revegetatian on the refuse pile (both the eusting LRP and any proposed expansion) would not <br />attempt to establish an oakbrush wmmunity. The currently approved seed mix reflects the <br />3 <br />