My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP46053
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP46053
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:49:03 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:47:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1996084
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
9/25/2006
Doc Name
2nd Quarter 2006 Excess Spoil Fill Reports
From
Peak Project Management, LLC
To
DRMS
Permit Index Doc Type
Waste Pile/Fill Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• INSPECTION OF EXCESS SPOIL FILL <br />Second Quarter 2006 Certification <br />Fill Area No. 9 <br />Date: June 12.2006 <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OR REFERENCE TO SITE PLAN: <br />The CTL Thompson report dated Apri127, 2001, "Stability Analysis and Geo-technical Recommendations <br />Lorencito Surface Mine Phase I^ addresses the general requirements as also cited in Sections 4.09.1 to <br />4.09.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />ACTIVITY DURING INSPECTION: <br />-Removal of Topsoil and Organic Matter <br />-Placement of Undertlrains <br />_Installation of Surface Drainage System <br />_Construction of Fill <br />_Placemem of Topsoil <br />Seeding <br />X Other Facility idle throughout the quarter <br />SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />Sediment pond construction has been completed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by ttre <br />DMG and as-constructed survey/drawings certiSed by Registered Land Surveyor and Registered <br />• Professional Engineer. All surface nmoff from the fill areas is directed to this sediment control facility <br />]mown as pond 7. Pond 9A was dry at time of inspection. <br />SURFACE DRAINAGE <br />Armored Ditches line the east and west bormdary of the fill area Lateral ditches on the fill face direct <br />runoff to tlrese side ditches. No erosional problems were noted at the intersections of the lateral ditches and <br />the armored ditches. <br />SITE PREPARATION <br />As indicated by previous inspection reports, organic materials such as brush and trees were removed from <br />the proposed fill area followed by topsoil removal prior to fill placement Desigrr criteria did not require <br />keyway cuts for steeper valleys with minimal soil cover (fill #9). No evidence of springs or seeps was <br />observed during site preparation <br />DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) <br />Drain sizes are specified by CDMG regulations for Ells which can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #9 <br />is not a valley fill. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum 6' x 12' triangulaz section(area = 64 SF) for <br />this size fill. As indicated by previous inspection reports, as constructed drainages generally were more <br />trapezoidal witlr a top width of 12', bottom width of 8', and average height of 8' (area = 80 SF). Sandstone <br />recovered from durable "channel" sandstone deposits encountered during the mining process were used in <br />• drain construction. Mirafi 160 fabric was used in lieu of filter material. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.