Laserfiche WebLink
INSPECTION OF EXCESS SPOIL FILL <br />- Second Quarter 2006 Certification <br />• Fill Area No. 7 <br />Date: June 12, 2006 <br />GENERAL DESCRIPTION OR REFERENCE TO SPI'E PLAN: <br />The CTL Thompson report dated Apri127, 2001, "Stability Analysis and Geo-technical Recommendations <br />Lorencito Surrace Mine Phase P' addresses the general requirements as also cited in Sections 4.09.1 to <br />4.09.2 of the Colorado Mined Land Reclamation Board for Coal Mining. <br />ACTIVITY DURING INSPECTION: <br />-Removal of Topsoil and Organic Matter <br />-Placement of Under-drains <br />Lrstallation of Surface Drainage System <br />-Construction of Fill <br />-Placement of Topsoil <br />Seeding <br />X Other None -Facility idle throughout the quarter <br />SEDIMENT CONTROL <br />Sediment pond construction has been completed in accordance with plans submitted to and approved by the <br />DMG and as-constmcted survey/drawings certified by Registered Land Surveyor and Registered <br />Professional Engineer. All surface nm-off from the fill area is directed to this sediment control facility <br />• known as Pond 7. No erosional problems were noted during this inspection. Pond was dry. Limited early <br />vegetation being grazed down by elk. <br />SURFACE DRAINAGE <br />Armored Ditches line the east and west boundary of the fill area Lateral ditches on the fill face direct <br />runoff m these side ditches. A fourth east-west ditch was constructed at the upper most extent of the fill, <br />connecting to both armored ditches on the east and west peruneters. No erosional problems were noted at <br />the intersections of the lateral ditches and the armored ditches. Slopes have become well vegetated and no <br />erosional problems were noted. <br />SITE PREPARATION <br />As indicated in previous inspection reports, organic materials such as brush and trees were removed from <br />the proposed fill area followed by topsoil removal prior to fill placement Design criteria did not require <br />keyway cuts for steeper valleys with minimal soil cover (fill #7). No evidence of springs or seeps was <br />observed during site preparation. <br />DRAINAGE SYSTEM (UNDERDRAINS) Drain sizes are specified by CDMG regulations for fi1Ls which <br />can be classified as Valley Fills. Fill area #7 is not a valley SII. CTL Thompson recommended a minimum <br />6' x 12' triangnlaz section (area = 64 SF) for this size fill. As indicated by previous inspection reports, as <br />constructed drainages generally were more trapezoidal with a top width of 12', bottom width of 8', and <br />• average height of 8' (area = 80 SF). Sandstone recovered from durable "channel^ sandstone deposits <br />encountered during the mining process was used in drain construction Mirafi 160 fabric was used in Geu of <br />filter material. <br />