My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP45460
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP45460
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:48:11 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:36:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1982057
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/2/1994
Doc Name
1993 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORT TEXT
Annual Report Year
1993
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
previously. Neither well exhibited water levels outside the ranges previously observed, <br />nor do they exhibit any long-term discernable trend. <br />Ground Water Level Summary. During 1993, most aquifers et Seneca 11-W exhibited a typical <br />seasonal fluctuation. Peter levels were highest (shallowest) after the spring snowpack <br />runoff which recharges the aquifer. Often, bedrock (i.e., non-alluvial) aquifers exhibit <br />a leg time between spring runoff end highest water levels. Pater levels then decrease <br />(deepen) as late summer or fall approaches. Many wells exhibited higher water levels this <br />year then they have for the past several years. This is primarily due to the greater <br />amount of snowpack runoff this spring. <br />Water quality. fable 3 (Appendix A), Summary of Ground Water Monitoring Wells, describes <br />the wells that were sampled, the sample frequency during the 1993 water year, and site <br />characteristics. In 1993, samples were collected from 21 wells. In addition, two wells <br />from which water samples are required (Wells 20A and 160V) were either dry or had not <br />enough water to sample. <br />Table 4 (Appendix A) shows the ground water parameter list used for all wells. Analyses <br />have been performed by ACZ Laboratory in Steamboat Springs, Colorado since May 31, 1983. <br />ACZ Laboratory performs all analyses by EPA or equivalent methods. Samples are delivered <br />the day of collection to the lab in en iced cooler. The following discussion of the <br />analytical data collected during the reporting period is arranged by strata being <br />monitored and coincides with the format (by aquifer type) in which the analytical data are <br />presented in Appendix D. Sampling techniques for each well are given in the remarks page <br />in the same appendix. <br />Tables 5 to 7 (Appendix A) tabulate the percentage of milliequivalents per liter of major <br />ions and total dissolved solids (TDS) for each well sampled. All data prior to 1990 has <br />been averaged together to provide the baseline (i.e., premining) conditions that existed. <br />In addition, the range of total dissolved solids (TDS) that existed prior to mining is <br />also given. Since mining began in 1990, data from that point on is listed separately. <br />The following discussion of water quality will limit itself to a description of major <br />ions. A separate section, Comparison of Ground Water Quality to Voter Use Standards, will <br />list those samples that exceed water use standards. <br />_. Alluvium. Samples from Well bA2 display a CaMgNa-HC03 type water with an average TDS <br />vat~ues of 703 mg/l in 1993. This is higher than the 611 mg/l baseline average, but falls <br />4 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.