Laserfiche WebLink
Woody plant density in the reclaimed areas monitored in 2001 was either very low (57 stems per <br />acre in the 1994 and 1999 reclaimed areas) or gratifyingly high {1093 and 996 stems per acre in <br />the 1997 general reclamation and 1997 Shrub Establishment areas, respectively). <br />Species Diversity and Composition <br />Relative cover by lifeform (Table 26) is depicted for the various sampled areas in Figure 5. As <br />can be seen the heavy dominance of woody species that characterizes the reference areas, <br />especially the Mountain Brush reference area is not matched in the reclaimed areas. In the oldest <br />ungrazed reclamation sampled (1994), the abundance of the introduced perennial forb alfalfa is <br />very large (over half of the vegetation cover). Younger reclamation sites show more even balance <br />between lifeforms. Older but grazed reclamation (PECOCO Pasture and Wadge Pasture) show <br />control of introduced perennial forbs, but introduced perennial grasses (intermediate wheatgrass <br />and smooth brome) have asserted overwhelming dominance. <br />Species density reflects the total number of species present (richness) in 100 square meters one <br />meter to either side of the 50m cover sample transects. Species density data are summarized in <br />Table 25 and graphically presented in Figure 4. As can be seen there, a balanced presence of <br />species exists in the reclaimed areas that is not reflected in the relative cover data. But for the <br />• aggressive presence of the introduced perennial grasses and forbs, it is likely that the species <br />density in the PECOCO and Wadge pastures would equal that of the reference areas. Of course, <br />without those aggressive and productive species, production would certainly be less. However, <br />that parameter so greatly exceeds the standard set by the reference areas that it would hardly <br />matter from a bond release point of view. <br />Species density data observed since 1990 at the Seneca II Mine are compiled in the table below. <br /> Reclaimetl Areas Mountain Brush Ref. Sagebrush Ref. Alkali Sgbr Ref. <br />2001 15.9 - 26.8 22.7 23.2 22.7 <br />2000 6.3 - 12.5 30.3 25.9 - <br />1999 25.8 - 27.5 36.2 32.8 -- <br />1998 10.4 - 15.2 29.6 25.1 - <br />1997 15.5 33.9 36.4 - <br />1996 13.5 - 19.7 27.2 35.4 - <br />1995 10 - 18.0 40.4 37.3 - <br />1994 15.7 - 19.9 31.3 28.3 - <br />1993 11.6 - 20.0 28.6 29 - <br />1992 12.1 - 19.0 28.7 24,6 - <br />1991 9.9 - 18.3 22.9 27.7 - <br />1990 9.5 - 18.9 22.9 25.9 - <br />Species density of the reclaimed areas has always been observed at levels below the reference <br />• areas. To a large degree this relates to the smaller presence of native perennial forbs in the <br />17 <br />