Laserfiche WebLink
Mountain Coa(Compnny 2000 Annual Hydrology Report West E!k Mine <br />• Hydrologic Monitoring Activities <br />Surface Water Monitoring <br />Prior to WY00, two surface water stations-Upper Gribble Gulch and West Gulch, East of Horse <br />Gulch-were removed from the monitoring program as pari of TR88. No new surface water <br />stations were added during VV1'00. All surface water stations were monitored as part of the regular <br />program since baseline had been established. The locations of all surface water monitoring stations <br />are shown on Map 2. Field water quality samples were taken three times during the water year at all <br />stations when sufficient flows were present. On an annual basis, all stations were sampled and the <br />samples were analyzed for a full suite of parameters (Table 1 }. <br />Sampling Methods <br />Surface water monitoring was conducted seasonally. Monitoring measurements included flow, field <br />parameters, and laboratory parameters as identified in Table 1. Surface water flow was measured <br />through Parshall flumes of varying sizes at the continuously recording stations identified in Table 1. <br />Continuous recording is done with Stevens Type F recorders and dataloggers. Temperature, pH, <br />and conductivity were obtained at each surface water sampling station by selecting a grab sample <br />volume from surface water flow and measuring the sample for the parameters using standard <br />instmments that were calibrated in the field. Samples for analysis of laboratory parameters were <br />collected by filling a clean pre-fixed sample bottle from non-aerated flow. Sample bottles were <br />sealed, labeled, placed on ice, and transported to the laboratory for analysis. All equipment was <br />• rinsed before and after sampling with distilled water, as well as sample water, prior to measurement <br />of sample parameters. <br />Seeps and Springs Monitoring <br />During WY00, twenty-four springs were included in the West Elk Mine monitoring program <br />(Map 2). Table 2 lists the springs and groups the springs into four broad categories: (1) springs <br />above the F-Seam in [Ire North Fork drainage basin; (2) springs in or below the F-Seam in the <br />North Fork drainage basin; (3) springs and other water resources above the B-Seam in the Jumbo <br />Mountain area in the North Fork drainage basin; and (4) springs above the E-Seam in the Dry <br />Fork drainage. Field ~~-ater quality samples were taken three times during the water year at all <br />stations that were flowing. On an annual basis, all stations were sampled and the samples were <br />analyzed for a full suite ofparameters (Table 2}. <br />As part of Technical Revision No. 88, approved in August 1999, seventeen springs were <br />removed from the monitoring program prior to the beginning of the water year. No new springs <br />were added to the monitoring program during WY00. While baseline monitoring continued on <br />spring I 1-2, all other springs were monitored as pari of the regular program. <br />• <br />831-032.550 Page 5 Wright Water Engineers <br />