My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44948
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44948
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:47:33 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:27:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
3/19/1998
Doc Name
ROADSIDE MINES 1996 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY REPORTS PN C-81-041
From
DMG
To
JIM BURNELL
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
iiiiiiiiiiiiiiuiii <br />999 <br />STATE OF COLORADO <br />DIVISION OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmenl ul Nalu ral Resources <br />1313 Sherman 51., Koom '15 <br />Denecr, Colorado 80'03 <br />Phone: 130]1 866 3567 <br />FAX: 1103) 83?-8106 <br />DATE: Mazch 16, 1998 <br />RECEIVED <br />MAR 19 1998 <br />~~~~~ <br />DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL <br />RESOURCES <br />TO: Jim Burnell Roy Romer <br />Division of Minerals & Geology governor <br />lames 5. Lochhead <br />FROM: Dan Mathews E~emirve Dneaor <br />Michael B. LOng <br />Drvismn Director <br />RE: Roadside Mine, 1996 Annual Hydrology Report <br />Permit C-81-041 <br />Enclosed for your review of conformance with PHC projections is the 1996, yes 1996, Roadside <br />Mine Annual Hydrology Report. Report submittal was delayed for various reasons for <br />approximately 10 months. <br />I have conducted a preliminary review of the report, and it appears that required data was <br />collected and analyzed, with only a few exceptions. Flow data for gaging stations SWGS-02d~"an"d <br />03 during July and August, 1996 was missing. For SWGS-02, the problem was appazently~et~ <br />a problem with the recorder, at least for a portion of the period of missing data. For SWGS-03, it <br />would appear that the missing data was due to flow level below the minimum recording level. <br />Operator references this matter briefly on page 2 of the report narrative. The only other <br />deficiency I noted was that SAR was not reported in the annual full suite analyses for Irrinewater <br />discharge samples for NPDS-001, 002, and 004, although analytical parameters needed to <br />calculate SAR were reported. <br />I will look forward to your evaluation. Let me know if you have any questions. <br />cc: Larry Routten <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.