Laserfiche WebLink
Pitch Reclamation Project April 29, 2004 <br />2003 Annual Reclamation Report Page 5 <br />The displacements indicated at two monitoring points, P-07 and MP-63, are questionable, based <br />on observations at surrounding monitoring points. The monitoring point P-07 is located on the <br />South Wall of the North Pit. The displacement indicated at P-07 for the 2003 yearly interval is <br />0.40 ft. Surrounding monitoring points within about 100 ft of P-07 indicate approximately an <br />order of magnitude less displacement. The surrounding monitoring points generally indicate a <br />dip direction of about 300°, while the dip direction at P-07 is 349°. These discrepancies are <br />likely due to survey error. A less likely explanation is that displacement at P-07 is the result of <br />very localized slope movement. Monitoring point P-07 is included on Figure A, pending the <br />results of ground-truthing, which will be conducted in early summer 2004. <br />Monitoring point MP-63 is located on the East Wall of the South Pit. The displacement indicated <br />at MP-63 for the 2003 yearly interval is 0.24 ft. Significant displacement has not been observed <br />in this area since the 1996 re-grade. Other monitoring points on the East Wall of the North Pit, <br />indicate approximately an order of magnitude less displacement than MP-63. This discrepancy <br />is likely the result of survey error, but may be attributable to localized slope displacement. <br />Monitoring point MP-63 is included on Figure A, with this area to be ground truthed in early <br />summer 2004. <br />All of the total displacement values for 2003 are less than or equal to 0.24 ft/year, with the <br />exception of P-07 as noted above. The lack of measurable slope displacement data, at a <br />number of monitoring points, suggests that the North Pit slopes have stabilized to less than 0.5 <br />ft/year. As was noted last year, as the number of monitoring points that exhibit slope <br />displacement decrease with time, the remaining points tend to cluster in the northeast corner of <br />the North Pit, and at the south wall of the North Pit. The northeast corner of the North Pit is the <br />location where the two rapid, large-scale slope displacements took place in 1983. The south <br />wall of the North Pit has historically been the second most active part of the North Pit, with the <br />northeast corner being the most active. The south wall of the North Pit also had a rapid, large- <br />scale slope displacement event in 1983. The clustering of slope movement in these two areas, <br />and the lack of slope displacement anywhere else in the North Pit, suggests that the North Pit <br />slopes are becoming more stable. The increased degree of stability is likely related to the pit <br />regrading work done in 1996, and decreased groundwater levels in response to several years of <br />relative) I~ow precipitation at the site <br />It is possible that in future years with above average precipitation, some increase in <br />displacement may occur due to saturation of the slopes. however, it is anticipated that any <br />increase in displacement would be in the range of 0.5 ft. per year. Overall, the potential for <br />catastrophic failure remains extremely low. <br />