My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44454
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44454
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:52 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:17:38 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
M1981021
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
11/15/1996
Doc Name
INTEROFFICE MEMO RECOMMENDATION FOR AN EXEMPTION OF DMO STATUS WEST SUNDAY MINE PN M-81-021 & SUNDAY
From
DMG
To
BRUCE HUMPHRIES
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
~~ <br />INTEROFFICE MEMORANDUM <br />DMSlON OF MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />TO: H. Bruce Humphri(~es, James Stevens <br />FROM: James Dillit: ~..lc' I. <br />DATE: November 15. 1996 <br />~ III IIIIIIIIIIIIIIII <br />RE: Recommendation for an Exemption of DMO Status, West Sunday Mine, <br />Permit No. M-81-021 and Sunday Mine, Permit No. M-77-285 <br />After reviewing the attached Einergy Fuels Nucleaz, Inc. report involving test results of the waste <br />dumps at the referenced mine sites it is my recommendation that the Division exempt these sites <br />from DMO status pursuant to Rule 7.2.6. <br />As defined in Rule 1.1(14), a designated mine operation means a mining operation at which: (a) <br />designated chemicals used in metallurgical processing aze present on-site; or (b) toxic or acid- <br />forming materials will be exposed or disturbed as a result of mining operations; or (c) acid mine <br />drainage occurs or has the potential to occur due to mining or reclamation activities. The <br />referenced mines do not use designated chemicals, have not disturbed or exposed acid-forming <br />materials, and do not have acid mine drainage. <br />The Division determined that ilte referenced mines had a reasonable potential to be a Designated <br />Mining Operations since then: was a possibility that toxic-forming materials were exposed or <br />disturbed as a result of minim; operations. The operator disputed the designation and proposed <br />to demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Division that toxic-forming materials have not been <br />exposed or disturbed in quantities sufficient to adversely affect human health, property or the <br />environment. <br />The operator and Division agreed that the only possible problem at these sites was the potential <br />for long-term exposure to ionizing radiation from Radium-226 (a decay product of Uranium <br />238/235). <br />The Division decided that a .OS% concentration of U308, or greater, would be considered toxic. <br />The decision to use .OS% U308 as a standard of toxicity was based on the following; 1) the <br />Department of Health, Radiation Control Division, exempts uranium concentrations of less than <br />.OS % from their regulations b~~cause the amount is considered non-hazardous and unregulatable <br />due to all the naturally-occurring uranium in the State, 2) the Department of Energy has <br />determined that if an individual camped on one of the waste dumps for 24 hours a day for 14 <br />days the Total Effective Dose ]Equivalent (TEDE) resulting from the exposure would be less than <br />the NRC standard of 100 mrem/yr: which is considered the maximum allowed exposure to <br />radiation and 3) the Bureau of Land Management has determined that uranium concentrations <br />less than .OS % are non-hazazdous. However, in order to minimize the potential exposure to <br />ionizing radiation, both the I)OE and BLM require the operators to: A) conduct a cursory <br />radiological scan of the entire mine site at closure, B) bacld"ill the materials of greatest concern <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.