My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44289
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44289
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:40 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:13:31 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981038
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
2/25/1985
Doc Name
ORCHARD VALLEY 1984 ANNUAL HYDROLOGY AND SUBSIDENCE REPORT SUBSIDENCE ASPECTS
From
JIM PENDLETON
To
SUSAN MOWRY
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
Page 1 of 1
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES <br />Davitl M. Getches, Executive Director <br />i iii iiiiiiiu iii <br />999 <br />MINED LAND RECLAMATION DIVISION <br />DAYID C. SHELTO H, Dlroctor <br />gichartl D. Lamm <br />Governor <br />DATE: February 25, 1985 <br />T0: Susan Mowry 1 ) <br />FROM: Jim Pendleton 1/ <br />RE: Orchard !lzl"fey 1 Annual Hydrology and Subsidence Report - Subsidence <br />Aspects <br />Pursuant to your request, I have completed a review of Colorado Westmoreland's <br />Annual Hydrology and Subsidence Report submitted for their Orchard Valley <br />underground coal mine, in compliance with stipulations placed upon permit <br />No. C-038-83. This report presents a clear rendition of the 1984 subsidence <br />data collected at the mine site. The report also presents a comprehensive <br />discussion of data implications, in terms of a comparison with original permit <br />application subsidence projections. Further, the report projects subsidence <br />occurrences for the coming 1985 season. The report is clear, concise, and <br />unambiguous. <br />In several instances, the report observes that additional monitoring may <br />justify monitoring requirement reduction in the future. I believe that this <br />may well be the case at many permitted mines throughout the state. However, <br />would caution the operator that an appropriate multi-year data base will be <br />required before such a decision would be warranted. Candidly, I doubt that <br />any reduction in monitoring requirements could be justified prior to the end <br />of the permit term requested in Permit Revision Application C-038-84, <br />currently under review by the Division. <br />cc: Bob Liddle <br />/fw <br />8013E <br />423 Centennial Building, 1313 Sherman Street Denver, Colorado 80203 Tel. (303) 866.3567 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.