Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> <br />STATE OF iiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii <br />999 <br />COLORADO <br />_ <br />DIVISION Ot MINERALS AND GEOLOGY <br />Deparlmem of Na Wral Resuurces <br />1713 Sherman A , Rnum 215 <br /> <br />Denver, Culuradu b0?Ol ~~~~~ <br />Phone' 13031 riMr35h7 <br />FA%. p031 832-81 OL <br /> DEPARTMENT' OF <br /> NATURAL <br />February 12, 1996 RESOURCES <br />Mark Kerr Roy Remer <br /> <br />Landmark Reclamation, Inc. Governor <br /> <br />4901 South Windermere Street lamess [„ennead <br />Fxecwrve DneUnr <br />Littleton, Colorado 80120 nnchael N. Lon{; <br /> Division Dua~or <br />Re: 1995 Annual Reclamation Report, Rimrock Coal Company <br />The Rirnrock Strip Mine, Permit No. C-89-074 <br />Dear Mr. Kerr: <br />The Division, on February 6, 1996, received the 1995 Annual Reclamation Report for the Rimrock Strip <br />Mine. The Division has concluded its review of the report and requests the following items be addressed. <br />1. Please provide the address of Rimrock Coal Company. Providing the address of the operator, <br />Landmark Reclamation, Inc., is not in accordance with Rule 2.04.13(1)(a). <br />2. Please provide the location, number of acres, and date(s) of planting for all previously revegetated <br />areas, in acwrdance with Rule 2.04.13(1)(FJ. The map provided in the report doesn't indicate this. <br />3. The map should be revised to differentiate among reclaimed disturbances, disturbances that won't be <br />reclaimed (roads), disturbances yet to be reclaimed (sediment pond and dam), and disturbances that <br />never occurred (Phase 2 Pit Area). The map should also identify the location of the light-use road <br />that exists from the crusher site to the southern end of the property boundary. <br />4. The sediment pond has not as yet been approved for permanent retention. The 0.13 acres attributed <br />to the pond's dam should therefore not be considered as permanent reclamation acreage at this time, <br />but rather as some type of "interim reclamation." Additionally, the acreage associated with the <br />sediment pond's basin should be identified as acreage "to be reclaimed." These categories would <br />exist until such time as the pond is either granted approval for permanent retention, or is backfilled <br />and graded. <br />5. The map provided in the report is captioned with the phrase "Plan trap showing location and amount <br />of disturbance totaling approx. 6.37 acres to be reclaimed." Should this be "acres reclaimed" <br />instead? <br />Please provide your responses to these items by February 29, ]996. <br />Sincerely, <br />I /! <br />~C L c. C c ~ /o" t ti,.Q~_~ <br />Daniel I. Herrtandez <br />Senior Environmental Protection Specialist <br />DIH/bjw <br />\HIWWMROCK.DIH <br />