My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44198
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44198
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:33 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:10:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1993 Revegetation Monitoring Report
Permit Index Doc Type
Reveg Monitoring Report
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
48
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• 1993 was the moistest period that has occurred during the years 1987 to 1993, in terms of <br />total precipitation for the previous 12 months (see Figure 7); it exceeded 1987 and 1992, the <br />previous wettest years in this measure. When ashorter-term cumulative measure of <br />precipitation is considered, such as 6 months (Figure 8) or 4 months (Figure 9), it can be seen <br />that 1993 was very moist, though less distinctly as cumulative period shortens. However, <br />1993 was a moderately warm year; total degree days at Hayden during the period of January <br />through June (Figure 10) was intermediate between the high extremes of 1987 and 1992 and <br />the low extremes of 1988, 1989, and 1991. This may have allowed photosynthesis to proceed <br />at a rapid rate without accompanying heavy evapotranspiration losses, explaining the <br />apparently very favorable growing conditions during 1993. <br />A summary of sample adequacy calculations for the parameters of cover, production and woody <br />plant stem density is presented in Table 26 (Appendix 1). As can be seen in Table 26, sample <br />adequacy was achieved or nearly achieved for all cover sampling (except for PECOCO Pasture, <br />which consisted of a mix of reclaimed and native vegetation), was sometimes close for <br />• production sampling, and was achieved for woody plant stem density in the reference areas only; <br />high variability in shrub presence in the reclaimed areas left calculated sample adequacy levels <br />mostly astronomical. <br />Of plant species observed during 1993 sampling, only Canada thistle (Cirsium arvensel, blue <br />lettuce (Lactuca tatarica ssp. Rulchellal, and whitetop fCardaria drabal are listed state-wide as <br />noxious weeds (Thornton et al., 1974). Only whitetop is a 'managed' noxious weed in Routt <br />County (Routt Co. Extension Agent, personal communication, 1993). Blue lettuce was observed <br />very sparingly in the the 1986 Reclaimed Areas, while whitetop was found in very small <br />amounts in the 1989 Reclaimed Areas. Buckhorn plantain (Plantaco lanceolatal and pennycress <br />(Thlasoi arvensel are both restricted noxious weeds in Colorado (Thornton et al., 1974); the <br />former is sparingly present at some locations in the reclaimed areas, while the latter is a <br />common species in the youngest reclaimed areas, and disappears within a few years. <br /> <br />33 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.