My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44174
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:32 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:10:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/15/1998
Doc Name
1997 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Sample Adequacy <br />A summary of sample adequacy calculations for the parameters of cover, herbaceous <br />production and woody plant stem density is presented in Table 12 (Appendix 1). As can be <br />seen in Table 12, sample adequacy was achieved or nearly achieved for all cover sampling, <br />was close to being achieved for herbaceous production sampling only in the Sagebrush <br />Reference Area, and was achieved for shrub density only in the two-stage sampling of shrub <br />density in the Wadge Pasture. <br />In accordance with atwo-stage statistical design, the Wadge Pasture was equally divided into <br />twenty primary sample units of approximately 15 acres each (Map 1); of the twenty primary <br />units, fifteen were randomly chosen for sampling. Fifteen was chosen as a sample size that <br />was short of expending the effort to sample everything, yet would provide an ample number <br />upon which to calculate variance. Within each primary unit, three (3) 2mx50m shrub density <br />transects were randomly located and randomly oriented in the normal fashion. The sampling <br />fraction of the primary units (n/N) was 15/20. The sampling fraction within each primary unit <br />(m/M) was 3/607, that is, within each 15 acre primary unit, there was a potential to have 607 <br />• different sample locations, of which three were actually sampled. Variance was calculated in <br />the fashion described in Cochran (1977: expression 10.14) and the Methods section above <br />(terms used in the expression below are defined in the Methods section). <br />1-t, 1-fZ <br />V~ S,Z + SZa <br />n mn <br />1-(15/20) 1-(3/607) <br />VY = 33.54 + 19.30 = 0.985 <br />15 3 x 15 <br />The result of sample adequacy calculation using the above calculated variance (0.985) was <br />that with a sample size of fifteen (the number of primary units), the minimum sample size <br />required (using atwo-tailed t-value with fourteen degrees of freedom: t=1.761) was nine. Thus, <br />• the use of a two-stage sampling approach allowed the achievement of sample adequacy with <br />22 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.