My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44174
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44174
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:32 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:10:14 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980005
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
4/15/1998
Doc Name
1997 REVEGETATION MONITORING REPORT
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• The 1989 average vegetation cover reflected a reduction of 24 percentage points from the <br />vegetation cover measured in 1987. The change in cover from 1987 to 1989 for the Sagebrush <br />Reference Area was nearly the same as the reclaimed areas (approximately 25 percentage <br />points). In 1990, the overall reclaimed area average rebounded by about 12 percent, while the <br />Sagebrush Reference Area recovered by 9 percent. In 1991, the Sagebrush Reference Area <br />cover increased by over 6 percent, while the reclaimed area average went up by about 5 percent. <br />In 1992, the Sagebrush Reference Area declined by about 11 percent while the overall average <br />dropped by about 8 percent. In 1993, the increase in cover in the reclaimed areas was <br />accompanied by a slight increase in the Sagebrush Reference Area and a rather large jump in <br />the Mountain Brush Reference Area. In 1994, the average reclaimed area cover declined by <br />about 10 percent, while cover in the Sagebrush Reference Area declined by about 4 percent. In <br />1995, average reclaimed area cover increased by about 13 percent, while Sagebrush Reference <br />Area cover rose by 8 percent. In 1996, cover in the Sagebrush Reference Area dropped by 5.6 <br />percent while the overall average dropped by 10.7 percent. In 1997, cover in the Sagebrush <br />Reference Area increased by 11 percent, while the reclaimed area number went up by 5.2 <br />• percent. Over the period of record, including 1997, there has been a clear pattern in which cover <br />in the reclaimed areas has varied similarly to cover in the Sagebrush Reference Area, which is <br />more like the reclaimed areas in that it has greater herbaceous cover than does the Mountain <br />Brush Reference Area. This, along with the prevalence of sagebrush and snowberry, suggests <br />successional development of reclaimed areas toward the Sagebrush vegetation type. If <br />reclaimed areas first achieve the greatest resemblance to the Sagebrush vegetation type, this is <br />not to predict that they may not proceed through further succession toward composition more <br />closely approximating Mountain Brush in time. <br />On the other hand, through 1996, the heavy woody cover of the Mountain Brush Reference Area <br />has shown a tendency to react with delay; reduction in cover percent during drought has been <br />delayed, as has recovery following cessation of drought. The Mountain Brush Reference Area <br />dropped only 9.7 percentage points from 1987 to 1989 (during the worst of the drought), but <br />continued to drop another 2 percentage points in 1990 (as the drought abated). In 1991, the <br />Mountain Brush Reference Area cover increased by nearly 8 percent, and in 1992 the total cover <br />decreased by 13 percent. The 1992 decline relates partly to the fact that the boundaries of the <br />• <br />13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.