Laserfiche WebLink
1 <br />1 <br /> 2.6 Vegetation Comparisons: 1986, 1988 and 1993 Vegetation Sampling <br /> <br /> Vegetation characteristics of the three Test Plots and the North and South Areas were <br /> evaluated over time through tables and computer-derived charts and graphs (Microsoft <br />' Excel). Additionally, the Test Plots were compared to Reference Area vegetation <br /> parameter values for their respective years. Each Test Plot Treatment Depth (6", 12", <br /> 24", 48") from each sampling year was independently compared to the value of <br />subsequent sampling year parameters to identify any trends in vegetation development. <br /> Notation of revegetation success for cover and herbaceous production was evaluated by <br />' sampling year. <br /> Species composition and diversity was evaluated through direct comparison of the <br />' number and identity of species and lifeforms encountered in the Reference Area and <br /> Test Plots (including North and South Areas) over time. Species composition was <br /> evaluated in terms of total species presence and presence of species comprising greater <br />' than 3% relative cover. <br /> 2.7 1993 Soil Comparisons: Test Plots <br /> <br /> Soil samples from each Test Plot were tested for pH, electrical conductivity (EC), <br />' calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na) and sodium adsorption ratio (SAR). <br />Twenty seven soil samples were collected and analyzed. Soil chemical characteristics <br /> of the three Test Plots were compared and contrasted through tables and computer- <br /> derived charts and graphs (Microsoft Excel). Pazameters for each Test Plot treatment <br />' depth (6", 12", 24", 48") were independently graphed to determine any trends in <br /> chemical distribution within the Test Plot soil columns. Of particular concern was <br />' whether salt migration was occurring within the soil column over time. <br /> 2.8 Soil Comparisons: 1986, 1988, 1993 Sampling <br /> i <br />l <br />l <br />d i <br />i <br />i <br />i <br />f <br />h <br />l <br />h <br />il <br />b <br />d <br /> mater <br />was samp <br />n s <br />Pr <br />or to construct <br />on o <br />e Test P <br />ots, t <br />e so <br />a <br />to <br />e use <br />e <br />tu <br />t <br /> to determine its suitability for use in the Test Plots. Initial soil sampling evaluated <br />' chemistry, fertility, and texture, and occurred in 1983. After Test Plot construction, <br /> soil sampling was undertaken to evaluate potential salt migration within the Test Plot <br /> soils in 1986 and 1988. Sampling again evaluated chemistry and fertility. Sampling <br />' in 1993 evaluated soil chemistry within the Test Plots to identify and evaluate any long <br /> <br />1 term trends in soil ion movement. <br />1 <br />1 <br />' 12 <br />