My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP44072
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP44072
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:25 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:07:52 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1981041
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
8/31/1993
Doc Name
POWDERHORN COAL CO ROADSIDE REFUSE DISPOSAL AREA FIELD TRIAL EVALUATION OF TEST PLOT VEGETATION AND
Permit Index Doc Type
REVEG MONITORING REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
116
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
2.2.1 Vegetation Cover Sampling <br />Vegetation cover was estimated using the same methods previously described for the <br />Test Plots. Vegetation cover transects on the Reference Area were randomly located <br />through gridding the entire Reference Area and then randomly selecting sample <br />locations. Vegetation cover data were collected until sample adequacy was achieved. <br />Sample adequacy calculation is discussed in Section 2.2.3. <br />2.2.2 Vegetation Herbaceous Production Sampling <br />Current year herbaceous production on the Reference Area was estimated using the <br />same methods discussed for the Test Plots. Herbaceous production data were collected <br />until sample adequacy was achieved. Sample adequacy calculation is discussed in <br />Section 2.2.3. <br />2.2.3 Determination of Sample Adequacy for Reference Area Sampling <br />Sample adequacy calculations were made for both vegetative cover and herbaceous <br />production sampling in the reference area in accordance with Colorado Division of <br />Minerals and Geology Guidelines (CDMG, 1988). The following formula was used for <br />these calculations: <br />(t)2 (s)2 <br />°min = -------------- <br />(d Xbar)2 <br />where: nmin =minimum sample size <br />t =the Student's t distribution value at the 90% confidence level <br />and sample size degrees of freedom <br />s =sample standard deviation (s)2= sample variance <br />d =percent acceptable deviation from the mean (]0%) <br />Xbar =sample mean <br />Sample adequacy was to be calculated for less than ten cover samples and less than 50 <br />production samples. If sample adequacy was indicated by less than the maximum <br />number of transects or quadrats, sampling was considered adequate for that parameter. <br />Parameters were tested at the 90`9 confidence level with atwo-tailed statistic. <br />10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.