My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
REP43822
DRMS
>
Back File Migration
>
Report
>
REP43822
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2016 12:46:08 AM
Creation date
11/27/2007 10:02:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
DRMS Permit Index
Permit No
C1980001
IBM Index Class Name
Report
Doc Date
12/11/2001
Doc Name
1996 AHR text and data
Annual Report Year
1996
Permit Index Doc Type
HYDROLOGY REPORT
Media Type
D
Archive
No
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
84
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
• Specific Conductivity/Total Dissolved Solids <br />Specific conductivity (Figure 23) and total dissolved solids (Figure 29) <br />values for the three alluvial wells have remained fairly constant over the majority <br />of the period of record. While Conductivity and TDS values at sites TR-3 and TR-9 <br />are consistent with values obtained during the baseline studies, these parameters <br />and several others have elevated rapidly and remained elevated at TR-1.5 since 1995. <br />The source of the elevated values is not readily identifiable. A few factors which <br />may have contributed to the elevated levels were mentioned in the 1996 Report (i.e., <br />inundation of the area in late spring of 1995 and the laying of telephone cable <br />immediately upstream of the area during the summer of 1995). If the elevated <br />Conductivity and TDS levels were primarily the result of the previously mentioned <br />activities, the concentrations should have returned to more historic levels during <br />the 1996 monitoring period. However, the concentrations have remained elevated, and <br />therefore it appears that the alluvium in this area is reflecting a plume of <br />upstream alluvial water containing high levels of TDS, possibly from an old <br />abandoned underground mine up the Little Trout Creek drainage. This conclusion is <br />based partially on the similarity of the water quality between TR-1.5 and WR-1. As <br />• previously discussed in the surface water section, data taken between October 1990 <br />and August 1992 is believed to be invalid due to instrument errors. <br />Conductivity and TDS values in Well WR-1 have progressed from elevated levels <br />each spring to lower concentrations in the fall for the past several years. This <br />phenomenon is caused by infiltration of snowmelt water leaching various minerals <br />within the unsaturated zone of reclaimed spoil. As the enriched flow is released <br />over the course of the summer, the conductivity values lessen to that of the <br />stagnant saturated zone. The levels of Conductivity and TDS decreased significantly <br />in late 1995 probably resulting from a drier than normal summer. In 1996, the trend <br />appears more normal reflecting precipitation and infiltration patterns as in <br />previous years. <br />Calcium/Magnesium/Sodium <br />Calcium (Figure 25) is the major cation found in all of the wells with <br />concentrations of sodium (Figure 26) and magnesium (Figure 27) occurring in lesser <br />quantities. TR-1.5 generally contained the lowest concentrations of cations with a <br />slight increase occurring downstream at TR-3 and TR-9 for the majority of the <br />record. However, elevated levels of these parameters at TR-1.5 began to occur in <br />• 1995 consistent with the elevated Conductivity and TDS levels previously mentioned. <br />31 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.