Laserfiche WebLink
from 360 to 889 , while pH ranged from 6. 6 to 8 . 3 . This seep is <br /> utilized for livestock and wildlife watering while contributing <br /> little to surface flow. <br /> Spring #20: Santistevan Canyon Flume (Table 10) . Quality and <br /> quantity of 3 Santistevan Canyon springs were monitored <br /> collectively at the flume location placed in the lower canyon. <br /> Flows originating from fractured shales and sandstone were measured <br /> between 3 and 50 gpm. Quality ranged from 504 to 583 conductivity <br /> and 6. 6 to 8. 7 pH. Current use is livestock and wildlife watering <br /> and for aesthetics as the flow creates a stream running through the <br /> ranchette development in the canyon. These springs are a valuable <br /> contribution to surface flow making Santistevan Canyon a perennial <br /> stream. <br /> Spring #l : Cherry Canyon (Table 11) . This seep originates <br /> from the interface of coal and shale. The spring was dry during <br /> the 1988 & 1989 survey. <br /> Springs #2-7 : Alamosito Canyon (Table 12) . This series of <br /> springs and seeps covered a reach of the canyon and each specific <br /> spring or seep could not be distinguished. The seepage results <br /> from an interface between the coal and shale. Flow and field <br /> parameters were measured below spring #7. Flows ranged from <1 to <br /> 4 gpm. Quality ranged from >37 to 825 conductivity and 7 . 2 to 8 . 2 <br /> pH. <br /> Spring #21: Lopez Canyon (Table 13) . This spring appeared <br /> to originate from a minor coal seam. The spring was dry at the <br /> time of the surveys. <br /> Springs #22-24 : Wet Canyon (Tables 14 , 15 , 16) . Springs in <br /> Wet Canyon were identified by sandstone outcrop areas in the stream <br /> bank. Flow ranged from 40 gpm at #22 to no flow at #24 . <br />