Laserfiche WebLink
- ~ ~II II~II~~I~II~~ II~ <br />sss <br />STATE OF COLORADO _ <br />DIVISION OF h11NERALS AND GEOLOGY \!'/r <br />Deparunem ni Nato r,ll Resources ~ <br />1717 shcrmdn sl.. Room ? 15 <br />Denvar, Colorado OU!U3 D I V I S I O N O F <br />Phone 1303) 866-3567 MINERAL S <br />FAX. (3037 83?-8106 ~ <br />GEOLOGY <br />DATE: Nla 5 1999 RECLAMATION <br />y ~ MINING•SAf E77 <br />Bill Owens <br />Governor <br />TO: Dan Hernandez <br />ereg E. bvalcner <br />1 Eeecw wz Dueaor <br />FROM: Joe Dudash ~ M¢hael B. Long <br />~I Division Dheaor <br />RE: Request For P'ro osed Civil Penalty Assessment, NOV CV-99-004, Bowie No. <br />2 Nline, Permit No. C-96-083, Bowie Resources Limited <br />I am requesting that you perform a proposed civil penalty assessment for Notice of Violation <br />CV-99-004. This NOV was issued to the Bowie No. 2 Mine on April 15, 1999 for failure to <br />construct the permanent coal mine refuse pile according to the Regulations and the approved <br />plan. <br />This issue was initiated by observations made by myself during a field inspection of the refuse <br />pile on February 24, 1998 (A copy of the inspection report and photographs are in the NOV file). <br />During that inspection, I noted that the operator had begun the placement of coal refuse onto the <br />newly constructed coal refuse pile. The amount of placed material was about 20 feet high at the <br />outslope crest of the pile at that time. I also noted that the material on top of the coal refuse pile <br />was rather wet and that subsoil was being mixed in with the wet coal refuse material. <br />The operator stated at that time that subsoil material was being mixed in with the wet coal refuse <br />in order to dry out the mix. I asked if compaction testing showed that the compaction was in <br />compliance. The operator responded that no compaction testing had been performed to date, but <br />that one was planned soon. During the inspection, I stated that I was concerned about the wet <br />coal refuse material, the addition of subsoil to the coal refuse material and the lack of <br />compaction testing for the fast 20 feet of the coal refuse pile. At that time, I said that I would <br />look into this matter. <br />The Division sent a letter, dated March 4, 1998, in which we expressed our concerns about how <br />the coal refuse material was being placed and with the lack of compaction testing (A copy of this <br />letter is in the NOV file). The first compaction testing was performed on March 5, 1993. That <br />test, and subsequent compaction tests, have shown that those lifts in the coal refuse pile have <br />been compacted in compliance with the Rules. However, the Division still had concerns about <br />the first 20 feet of placed material. <br />The discussion continued over the ensuing months. Finally, at the Division's request, the <br />operator performed compaction testing of the bottom 20 feet of placed material. Three boreholes <br />